2016
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-8529.2016380100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign policy of the New Left: explaining Brazil's Southern partnerships

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to consider the relationship between domestic change and foreign policy in Brazil, a country seeking to become Latin America's hegemon, and achieve greater global status. It focuses on Brazil's partnerships with other countries in the Global South. It argues that, due to the combination of institutions and interests behind foreign policy-making in Brazil, there is no coherent project of South-South engagement. As a result, South-South ties tend to contradict the Brazilian governmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of this paper is threefold. First, we argue that current infrastructure projects planned and constructed by new “partners” such as China and, though not attended to within this paper, even Brazil (see Pickup 2016), who get this distinction, habitually, because of their lack of colonial history in Africa, engage and extend already existing dynamics of pathological racialisation of Africa and Africans even amidst claims to horizontal “South–South” cooperation and “win–win” bromides. Though these more recent partners uphold long established material and vernacular tropes that frame Africa simultaneously in terms of deficit and as the next frontier, prevailing discourses about their presence rarely attend to the racialisations they build on and reproduce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The goal of this paper is threefold. First, we argue that current infrastructure projects planned and constructed by new “partners” such as China and, though not attended to within this paper, even Brazil (see Pickup 2016), who get this distinction, habitually, because of their lack of colonial history in Africa, engage and extend already existing dynamics of pathological racialisation of Africa and Africans even amidst claims to horizontal “South–South” cooperation and “win–win” bromides. Though these more recent partners uphold long established material and vernacular tropes that frame Africa simultaneously in terms of deficit and as the next frontier, prevailing discourses about their presence rarely attend to the racialisations they build on and reproduce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It reinforces the idea that solidarity 'talk' is dispensable and that trade and investment are central in Brazil's politics. Be that as it may, Brazil's reliance on sustained market growth and exports of primary commodities brings about other forms of dependencies (Pereira et al 2016). This then influences the perception of Brazil's engagement with the BRICS forum-especially when taken into consideration the more successful economic members (e.g., China).…”
Section: Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, in the sections below, I examine the interplay between structural and domestic determinants in defining the form of Brazil's cooperation -and ultimately, in later Chapters, its effects. This analysis brings in much of the insights raised in the political economy critiques made of both traditional aid and 17 Much of this section is developed in Pickup (2016).…”
Section: Emerging Powers and A Post-neoliberal Brazil 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seabra (2014) also provides a "complement" to such accounts by arguing that defense cooperation has also dramatically increased over the previous decade (p. 78). The rest of this section is based on arguments I develop elsewhere (Pickup, 2016) on how foreign policy behaviour has been influenced by institutional arrangements and by several key constituencies that are in some ways specific to that realm.…”
Section: Emerging Powers and A Post-neoliberal Brazil 17mentioning
confidence: 99%