2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-71822012000200010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: RESUMOEste artigo discute uma modalidade de barebacking (sexo anal desprotegido) denominada de parcial ou com redução de riscos. Esta discussão é decorrente de uma etnografia online sobre os sentidos e práticas de barebacking, no contexto brasileiro, entre os anos de 2004 a 2007. Entretanto, ao focalizar a redução de riscos no barebacking, este artigo traz outras formas, práticas, possibilidades eróticas de realização e entendimento do mesmo. É o caso, por exemplo, quando alguns praticantes evitam ejacular den… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these new scenarios of co-produced subjects, technologies, and other entities, including the sex "event" itself 23 , neither subjects nor technologies are the same. In sexual encounters, irrespective of intentionality and prior, condoms may enter or exit the scene (as may PrEP itself, given its different modalities, interests, and modes of use), insofar as there are many ways of managing or reducing risk 13,39,40,53 . Ultimately, in concrete, lived situations, things happen that were unplanned or unforeseen, mediated by a "swarm" of actors/actants 26 that come in our direction, prompting us to respond or constitute ourselves via these interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these new scenarios of co-produced subjects, technologies, and other entities, including the sex "event" itself 23 , neither subjects nor technologies are the same. In sexual encounters, irrespective of intentionality and prior, condoms may enter or exit the scene (as may PrEP itself, given its different modalities, interests, and modes of use), insofar as there are many ways of managing or reducing risk 13,39,40,53 . Ultimately, in concrete, lived situations, things happen that were unplanned or unforeseen, mediated by a "swarm" of actors/actants 26 that come in our direction, prompting us to respond or constitute ourselves via these interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seen in this light, it should therefore be stressed that many gay and other MSM may also use different strategies to reduce or manage their risk of HIV infection or transmission in their sexual activities in ways that are more consistent with their own sexual desires, experiences, and practices 39 . They may also prefer to be top or bottom, may seek partners that are seroconcordant for a relationship, try to withdraw before ejaculating or even rely on certain "bodily signs" to assess whether they can "trust" their partner 40 . In other words, even in condomless sex, there are other forms of care that are brought into play above and beyond the biomedical rationale, mediated by native theory or by knowledge stemming from lived bodily experiences, in which different senses (sight, taste, smell, etc.)…”
Section: Condomless Anal Sex Between Men: a Borderland Between Risk A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nos nossos achados, tais fatores tiveram forte relação com o uso inconsistente do preservativo e, como consequência, foi um motivador na busca por PEP. Esses achados corroboram desafios no campo da prevenção envolvendo o fortalecimento de redes de apoio 42,43 e de programas de redução de danos 44,45 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…In this sense, avoid ejaculating within partners’ anal cavity was highlighted as increasing the chance of not taking the test. The literature points out that this is a strategy for minimizing or reducing risks and damages among seronegative and seropositive MSM, and is used to justify or enable sex without condoms (Silva, 2012). It is believed that sperm brings the greatest possibility of infection and that avoiding ejaculation within their partners minimizes the chance of having some STIs (Silva, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%