2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-67202014000200013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy in cholelithiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: IntroductionA introdução da técnica laparoscópica em 1985 foi um fator importante na colecistectomia por representar técnica menos invasiva, resultado estético melhor e menor risco cirúrgico comparado ao procedimento laparotômico.AimTo compare laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy in the treatment of cholelithiasis.MethodsA systematic review of randomized clinical trials, which included studies from four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Lilacs) was performed. The keywords used were "Cholecyst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the length of hospitalization, the results were contradictory, when compared to the recommendations in the literature (17) as there was a higher frequency of infection in patients with a shorter hospitalization period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Regarding the length of hospitalization, the results were contradictory, when compared to the recommendations in the literature (17) as there was a higher frequency of infection in patients with a shorter hospitalization period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Meanwhile, in Brazil, we had the first RRP only in 2008 (8 years delay when comparing with the USA); nowadays less than 5% of RPs are RRPs and we have just 26 robotic systems in Brazil and another 27 in all of Latin America (37)(38)(39). Another clear example of poor technology accessibility in Brazil is that 88% of elective cholecystectomies performed are conventional procedures and only 12% are laparoscopic (40).…”
Section: Difficulties For Technology Adoption In South Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] The relationship between SSIs and possible contamination during surgery has already been confirmed in some studies. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Potentially contaminated surgeries, classified as class II, due to their potential for contamination, are performed in tissues colonized by small microbial flora or in colonized tissues free from infection and inflammation. 1,16 Contamination of the surgical site can occur at any time in the perioperative period, due to the patient's risk factors, the surgical procedure and the hospital environment from the preoperative period to the postoperative period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%