2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006000300010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação da peregrinação anteparto numa amostra de puérperas no Município do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 1999/2001

Abstract: The access to obstetric care in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, was

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
2
38

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
14
2
38
Order By: Relevance
“…5,19 In Rio de Janeiro, for example, a third of 6,652 pregnant women in labour had to look for health care in more than one hospital. 23 Limited numbers of beds in neonatal and adult intensive care units was the most common reason for this problem in Metropolitan region, and too few medical staff was the most frequent reason in the interior of the State.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,19 In Rio de Janeiro, for example, a third of 6,652 pregnant women in labour had to look for health care in more than one hospital. 23 Limited numbers of beds in neonatal and adult intensive care units was the most common reason for this problem in Metropolitan region, and too few medical staff was the most frequent reason in the interior of the State.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of linkage between the services providing prenatal and delivery care is another problem identified, resulting in the pilgrimage of pregnant women in labour in search of a place for hospitalization, bringing additional health risks to the pregnant woman and her newborn 7,8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este padrão gera um grande fluxo de gestantes em busca de atendimento. Ao percorrer grandes distâncias torna-se mais difícil o acesso aos serviços e, principalmente, a adequação de suas necessidades aos serviços oferecidos (5) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified