2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352012000600020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameters for evaluation of clinical trial in mice infected with Trypanosoma cruzi

Abstract: The effectiveness of clinical parameters in the evaluation of Trypanosoma cruzi infection was analyzed in male Swiss mice at 8 weeks old Animals were divided into HG (healthy) and IG (1400 trypomastigotes, intraperitoneally, Y strain -Trypanosoma cruzi). Quantitative and qualitative parameters were evaluated in non-consecutive days in the period, from 7 th -11 th and 15 th -18 th days of infection. There were significant differences (P<0.05) between both groups in both periods regarding water consumption, abdo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, when administered 3 days before infection and 3 days after infection (TBA 7dH ), the animals had lower parasitemia and a longer survival curve compared with the control group, reflected by a better clinical evolution (i.e., stable body temperature, higher body weight gain, and higher food and water intake compared with the control group) on day 11e28 after infection, a period of high morbidity when animals usually start to present a reaction to the infection. 25 In this experimental model (Swiss mice are highly susceptible to infection), the evolution of the disease is irreversible, culminating in the death of untreated animals (IC group). 28 Thus, an increase in the survival period, a decrease in parasitemia, and better clinical evolution in the host are indicators of a good treatment scheme, independent of the presence of the parasite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, when administered 3 days before infection and 3 days after infection (TBA 7dH ), the animals had lower parasitemia and a longer survival curve compared with the control group, reflected by a better clinical evolution (i.e., stable body temperature, higher body weight gain, and higher food and water intake compared with the control group) on day 11e28 after infection, a period of high morbidity when animals usually start to present a reaction to the infection. 25 In this experimental model (Swiss mice are highly susceptible to infection), the evolution of the disease is irreversible, culminating in the death of untreated animals (IC group). 28 Thus, an increase in the survival period, a decrease in parasitemia, and better clinical evolution in the host are indicators of a good treatment scheme, independent of the presence of the parasite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animals were clinically evaluated 3 days before infection and on days 0, 4,8,11,15,18,21,25, and 28 after infection using a standard schedule. Body mass (g) was measured using a semi-analytical balance (BEL Engineering, Class Mark II).…”
Section: Clinical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os animais foram divididos em quatro grupos, mantidos em gaiolas e avaliados durante cinco dias antes da infecção, no dia da infecção e 27 dias consecutivos após a infecção em horário fixo (14). Os seguintes parâmetros foram avaliados: Pesoexpresso em grama (g), avaliado individualmente em balança digital BEL engineering ® -Class Mark II 500g; Temperaturaexpressa em grau centigrado (ͦ C), medida individualmente na região anterior da coxa traseira esquerda (menor quantidade de pelos), utilizando termômetro infravermelho digital Icel (modelo TD-920.0387); Consumos de água e raçãoexpressos em mililitro (mL) e grama (g), respectivamente.…”
Section: Parâmetros Clínicosunclassified
“…Treatment was diluted in water (1mL/100mL). Clinical (temperature, weight, water/foodintake and excreta) [2] and parasitological parameters (pre-patent and patent period, peak parasitemia, and parasitemia overall survival time) [3] were assessed daily. Data were compared BioEstat 5.0, significance level of 5 %.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%