2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352011000100039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neospora caninum antibodies and risk factors in dogs from Lages and Balneário Camboriú, SC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is similar to the report in Italy [ 31 ] and Pakistan [ 24 ], and there was no age effect on the magnitude of N. caninum seroprevalence. However, in contrary to the statement that N. caninum infections have a correlation to the age of dogs, young dogs were more vulnerable than adult dogs [ 41 ]. According to the upkeep methods, the seroprevalence of N. caninum on caged and free-roaming dogs was, respectively, 1.3% and 5.7%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This finding is similar to the report in Italy [ 31 ] and Pakistan [ 24 ], and there was no age effect on the magnitude of N. caninum seroprevalence. However, in contrary to the statement that N. caninum infections have a correlation to the age of dogs, young dogs were more vulnerable than adult dogs [ 41 ]. According to the upkeep methods, the seroprevalence of N. caninum on caged and free-roaming dogs was, respectively, 1.3% and 5.7%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The current results were demonstrated that in Iraq, the seroprevalence of neosporosis has a wide range in infection rates with presence of contrast between study's districts. This finding might be attributed to inequality of applied techniques and/or their cut-offs, origin of evaluated herds and probability of frequent exposing to sources of infection (24). As well as, the increasing of seroprevalence could be occur because discrepancy of animal housing or management, herds that involved in a study, increasing exposure to definitive host or intermediate hosts, and the contact, directly or indirectly, to adjacent endemic areas (25,26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%