2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352009000700009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Situação epidemiológica da brucelose bovina no Estado do Paraná

Abstract: Realizou-se um estudo para caracterizar a situação epidemiológica da brucelose bovina no Estado do Paraná. O Estado foi estratificado em sete circuitos produtores ou regiões. Em cada circuito foram amostradas aleatoriamente cerca de 300 propriedades e, dentro dessas, foi escolhido de forma aleatória um número pré-estabelecido de animais, dos quais foi obtida uma amostra de sangue. No total, foram amostrados 14.857 animais, provenientes de 2.098 propriedades. Em cada propriedade amostrada foi aplicado um questi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
32
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since most of the dogs evaluated during this study were mongrels maintained in shelters it was not possible to determine their original residence, i.e., if they were originated from rural areas and hence more apt to be in contact with contaminated animal remnants or animals infected by brucellosis. Additionally, a seroepidemiological survey of bovine brucellosis within the state of Paraná has demonstrated that prevalence indices varies between 0.85% to 2.82%, with 2.4% of cattle from the Centre/West/Northern of Paraná being seropositive (DIAS et al, 2009); this reduced prevalence of bovine brucellosis within our region might have also contributed to the negative results observed during this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Since most of the dogs evaluated during this study were mongrels maintained in shelters it was not possible to determine their original residence, i.e., if they were originated from rural areas and hence more apt to be in contact with contaminated animal remnants or animals infected by brucellosis. Additionally, a seroepidemiological survey of bovine brucellosis within the state of Paraná has demonstrated that prevalence indices varies between 0.85% to 2.82%, with 2.4% of cattle from the Centre/West/Northern of Paraná being seropositive (DIAS et al, 2009); this reduced prevalence of bovine brucellosis within our region might have also contributed to the negative results observed during this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, in order to establish rational strategies for combating bovine brucellosis, its epidemiological status was studied in 18 Federative Units, which revealed that the prevalence of infected herds ranged from 0.32% in Santa Catarina to 41.5% in Mato Grosso do Sul (ALMEIDA et al, 2016;ALVES et al, 2009;AZEVEDO et al, 2009;BORBA et al, 2013;SIKUSAWA et al, 2009;CHATE et al, 2009;CLEMENTINO et al, 2016;DIAS et al, 2009aDIAS et al, , 2009bGONÇALVES et al, 2009aGONÇALVES et al, , 2009bKLEIN-GUNNEWIEK et al, 2009;MARVULO et al, 2009;NEGREIROS et al, 2009;OGATA et al, 2009;ROCHA et al, 2009;SILVA et al, 2009;VILLAR et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of brucellosis infected herds varied from 0.32% in the state of Santa Catarina to 41.5% in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul (ALVES et al, 2009;AZEVEDO et al, 2009;BORBA et al, 2013;CHATE et al, 2009;DIAS et al, 2009aDIAS et al, , 2009bGONÇALVES et al, 2009aGONÇALVES et al, , 2009bKLEIN-GUNNEWIEK et al, 2009;MARVULO et al, 2009;NEGREIROS et al, 2009;OGATA et al, 2009;ROCHA et al, 2009;SIKUSAWA et al, 2009;SILVA et al, 2009;VILLAR et al, 2009;ALMEIDA et al, 2016;CLEMENTINO et al, 2016). The states of Santa Catarina, São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Rondônia, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, and Rio Grande do Sul carried out a second study on the prevalence of brucellosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%