2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352008000300023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelagem comparativa da cinética da fase sólida do capim-elefante picado, suplementado ou não com concentrados, e fornecido a vacas Holandês x Zebu em lactação

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study carried out with lactating cows that were fed corn silage-based diets, Bettero et al (2013) also did not observe an effect of the inclusion of 2% SO in the diet on the particulate passage rate in the rumen. In general, as presented in Table 5 and corroborating the results reported by Lopes et al (2008), the ruminal and post-ruminal particulate passage rates obtained from the adjustment of the fecal chromium excretion data to the Grovum and Williams (1973) model were, respectively, higher and lower than those estimated from the Dhanoa et al (1985) model. According to Ellis et al (1994), estimates of similar ruminal (k 1 ) and post-ruminal (k 2 ) passage rates (k 1 ≅ k 2 ) are inconsistent with the assumptions related to two-compartment models, and based on this, they have recommended that the ratio between these two parameters (k 2 ÷ k 1 ) should exceed the value of 1.5 to obtain a reliable estimate of the passage rate.…”
Section: Itemsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study carried out with lactating cows that were fed corn silage-based diets, Bettero et al (2013) also did not observe an effect of the inclusion of 2% SO in the diet on the particulate passage rate in the rumen. In general, as presented in Table 5 and corroborating the results reported by Lopes et al (2008), the ruminal and post-ruminal particulate passage rates obtained from the adjustment of the fecal chromium excretion data to the Grovum and Williams (1973) model were, respectively, higher and lower than those estimated from the Dhanoa et al (1985) model. According to Ellis et al (1994), estimates of similar ruminal (k 1 ) and post-ruminal (k 2 ) passage rates (k 1 ≅ k 2 ) are inconsistent with the assumptions related to two-compartment models, and based on this, they have recommended that the ratio between these two parameters (k 2 ÷ k 1 ) should exceed the value of 1.5 to obtain a reliable estimate of the passage rate.…”
Section: Itemsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…According to Ellis et al (1994), estimates of similar ruminal (k 1 ) and post-ruminal (k 2 ) passage rates (k 1 ≅ k 2 ) are inconsistent with the assumptions related to two-compartment models, and based on this, they have recommended that the ratio between these two parameters (k 2 ÷ k 1 ) should exceed the value of 1.5 to obtain a reliable estimate of the passage rate. This recommendation allowed for Lopes et al (2008) to conclude that the process of time-dependence implicit in the multicompartmental model promoted a better adjustment of the fecal excretion data. These authors, who worked with lactating Holstein x Zebu cows fed chopped elephantgrass supplemented with non-lipid concentrate, reported ruminal and post-ruminal particulate passage rates, estimated from the model of Dhanoa et al (1985), respectively, from 2.61 to 2.97% h -1 and from 8.17 to 10.94% h -1 , that is, close to those obtained in the present study (Table 5).…”
Section: Itemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average value presented by Bettero et al (2013) was 3.6% h -1 , which is close to the values estimated mainly through the Grovum and Williams (1973) model (Table 5). Corroborating the results reported by Lopes et al (2008) and Ribeiro et al (2018), the ruminal and postruminal particulate passage rates obtained from the adjustment of the fecal chromium excretion data to the Grovum and Williams (1973) model were, respectively, higher and lower than those estimated from the Dhanoa et al (1985) model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%