2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352003000400013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Foram utilizados 3.000 pintos de corte em delineamento inteiramente ao acaso com cinco repetições de 150 aves por unidade experimental para avaliar o efeito de promotores de crescimento sobre o consumo de ração, ganho de peso e conversão alimentar de frangos de corte. As dietas experimentais foram: 1- dieta inicial (20,2% de proteína bruta e 2931kcal de energia metabolizável) de 1 a 20 dias de idade (DI) e dieta final (18,5% de proteína bruta e 2993kcal de energia metabolizável) de 21 a 40 dias de idade (DF); … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
1
12

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
2
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with those of Pelicano et al (2004) and Gunal et al (2006) in broilers, and Cakir et al (2008) and Babazadeh et al (2011), who did not find any significant effect of probiotics on feed intake of Japanese quails, whereas Corrêa et al (2003) and Bitterncourt et al (2011) showed that dietary probiotics reduced the feed intake of broilers. Alkhalf et al (2010) reported that a probiotic level of 0.8 g/kg feed enhanced the live performance of broilers compared with the control diet and that with 1.6 g probiotic/kg.…”
Section: Effect Of Probiotics On Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These results are consistent with those of Pelicano et al (2004) and Gunal et al (2006) in broilers, and Cakir et al (2008) and Babazadeh et al (2011), who did not find any significant effect of probiotics on feed intake of Japanese quails, whereas Corrêa et al (2003) and Bitterncourt et al (2011) showed that dietary probiotics reduced the feed intake of broilers. Alkhalf et al (2010) reported that a probiotic level of 0.8 g/kg feed enhanced the live performance of broilers compared with the control diet and that with 1.6 g probiotic/kg.…”
Section: Effect Of Probiotics On Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For this particular study it is believed that the microbiologic challenge was not enough so the product would show its deed. Dalólio et al (2015) did not find significant differences in the inclusion of varied additives as an alternative to the antimicrobials in hick broiler's diet, in relation to the carcass yield and the cuts, as in the present study. On the other hand, Albino et al (2006) witnessed an upgrading on breast yield, breast fillet and legs as they used prebiotics in hick broiler's diet.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Environment, sanitary challenge, the animal's physiology, species are some of the topics to be focused on probiotic evaluation on diets. Corrêa et al (2003) did not observe difference in between the treatments (p>0,05) involving live weight and carcass yield, of breast and abdominal fat, while evaluating the effect of the probiotics over performance and carcass yield of hick broilers. The authors disclose that the efficiency of the probiotic can be relatively linked to the actions to improve intestinal health; however, in some cases those agents may or may not suffer interference of external agents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Os valores de ganho de peso médio obtido nesta pesquisa estão de acordo com os encontrados por Corrêa et al (2003), que testando o Calsporin 10 (probiótico que apresenta como ingrediente ativo esporos de Bacillus subtilis); Estibion aves (poliprobiótico constituído de cepas de Lactobasillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Estreptococcus salivarium, Estreptococcus faecium, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus toyoi, Sacharomices cerevisae) e bacitracina de zinco, verificaram que os diferentes tratamentos não influenciaram estatisticamente (P>0,05) no ganho de peso, sendo observado valores numéricos muito próximos entre eles. Entretanto, os referidos autores encontraram diferença estatística significativa (P<0,05) para consumo de ração e conversão alimentar, sendo o menor consumo de ração e a melhor conversão alimentar obtidos pelas aves submetidas ao poliprobiótico Estibion aves.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified