Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo

Abstract

Democracy and efficiency: hard relations between politics and economy. Many economists see politics as an irrational activity. They also think state action usually generates market inefficiencies and democratic institutions, such as elections, often work as obstacles to sound economic measures. Showing that vision has been embedded into the main currents of economic thought since the last century, we also argue those ideas are exported to great part of contemporary political science, including the area of public policies. Examining the literature, we show that rational choice political scientists, as the economists, claim governability and effective decisions will be guaranteed mainly through concentrated arenas or through insulated arrangements able to protect policy makers from political interference. In other words, governability depends on the reduction of the political arenas. On the contrary, we reject this technocratic solution of splitting politics from economy. With the support of classical pluralist thinkers, we stand another conception, arguing politics is the privileged social space for building interests and values in an institutionalized way. The difficulties to surpass current international crises since 2008 reveal this is a crucial problem: reducing politics would prevent societies from improving institutional solutions which are the only ones able to give space to emerging conflicts and, then, reach eventual consensus around them.

Planning pathways in the transfer of Directly Observed Treatment of Tuberculosis

“…Semantically, however, we observe the possibility of a collective development and a living, dynamic, non-static territory that ascends to the idea of ​​trainings, and of the very elaboration of a plan. We cannot lose sight of the fact that the success in implementation of public policies occurs by institutional structures enabling negotiations and debates among the multiplicity of agents in the respective decision-making process, among other factors 26 .…”

Capacidades estatais para políticas de infraestrutura no Brasil contemporâneo

“…This is not to say that investment decisions in this sector should dispense with planning, evaluation or project selection techniques. As Loureiro and Abrucio (2012) state, the intelligence of democracy rests precisely in its capacity to incorporate technical knowledge and rational analysis into politics.…”

(Des)Conexões Estado-Sociedade no Brasil: Um Estudo Sobre a Experiência de Construção de Cisternas no Semiárido

“…Afastando-se das teses que advogavam pelo insulamento do Estado como condição necessária à efetividade das políticas públicas, a Governança Pública passa a enfatizar aquilo que Evans (1993) chamaria de estruturas sociais circundantes e o papel das interações entre os atores sociais para o aperfeiçoamento destas mesmas políticas e para a promoção da cidadania (Loureiro & Abrucio, 2012;Peters & Pierre, 1998;Thoenig, 2007). Preocupação semelhante também aparece em Evans (1996) e Ostrom (1996, autores cujas teorizações, respectivamente, creditaram aos regimes sinérgicos e de coprodução capacidades em aprimorar processos colaborativos público-privados para o gerenciamento das demandas coletivas.…”