2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-20612013000400003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners

Abstract: 0.05) between themselves in terms of vitamin C content and total titratable acidity. As for appearance and aroma, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the samples, and as for flavor and overall impression, the most accepted samples were those with sucrose and sucralose. The internal preference mapping indicated that the most accepted samples were those with sucrose, sucralose, and neotame were. The highest frequency of positive purchase intent scores was observed for sucrose and sucralose.]]>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results in Table 5, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) for the attribute appearance between the passion fruit juice samples evaluated by consumers. Similar results were observed in grape nectar (Voorpostel et al 2014), diabetic/reduced calorie chocolates (Melo et al 2009), concentrated reconstituted pineapple juice (Marcellini et al 2005), guava nectar (Brito and Bolini 2008a), and acerola nectar (Dutra and Bolini 2013).…”
Section: Acceptance Testsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to the results in Table 5, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) for the attribute appearance between the passion fruit juice samples evaluated by consumers. Similar results were observed in grape nectar (Voorpostel et al 2014), diabetic/reduced calorie chocolates (Melo et al 2009), concentrated reconstituted pineapple juice (Marcellini et al 2005), guava nectar (Brito and Bolini 2008a), and acerola nectar (Dutra and Bolini 2013).…”
Section: Acceptance Testsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…), concentrated reconstituted pineapple juice (Marcellini et al. ), guava nectar (Brito and Bolini ), and acerola nectar (Dutra and Bolini ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This effect might be tested with stevia and other sweeteners in order to observe the resultant profile. For acerola nectar, a solution to reduce the bitterness and to increase the acceptability of samples sweetened with stevia extracts was the use of extracts with rebaudioside higher levels, according to Dutra and Bolini (2013). The authors reported that acerola nectar samples sweetened with stevia containing higher levels of rebaudioside were more accepted than the sample sweetened with stevia extract with 40% rebaudioside.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%