2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2010007500031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of polymerase chain reaction for early diagnosis of tuberculosis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies showed similar results to our study (21)(22)(23). However, some studies reported a lower sensitivity of about 20% to 50% (20,21,24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies showed similar results to our study (21)(22)(23). However, some studies reported a lower sensitivity of about 20% to 50% (20,21,24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Another report showed a PCR sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 60% for diagnosis of M. tuberculosis in culture (22). Overall, our data showed that the buffer method is more efficient for direct DNA isolation compared with that of the boiling method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Acid-fast staining and Mtb culture are classical Mtb diagnosis techniques. The acid-fast stain lacks sensitivity, and the culture requires several weeks for incubation [ 3 , 4 ]. The inherent limitations make it difficult for them to meet the requirement for early diagnostics [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sputum smear microscopy shows low sensitivity, and culture is usually time consuming due to the slow growth rate of M. tuberculosis (Chagas et al . ; Shinu et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional diagnostic methods have inherent limitations (Kh echine and Drancourt 2011). Sputum smear microscopy shows low sensitivity, and culture is usually time consuming due to the slow growth rate of M. tuberculosis (Chagas et al 2010;Shinu et al 2011). This may lead to severe consequences, including false-negative diagnosis, which may increase the risk of M. tuberculosis transmission, TB incidence and resistance to drugs (Helb et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%