2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2005000400012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can organic and transgenic soy be used as a substitute for animal protein by rats?

Abstract: We evaluated the protein quality of organic and transgenic soy fed to rats throughout life. Thirty female Wistar rats were divided into three groups (N = 10): organic soy group (OSG) receiving organic soybased diet, genetically modified soy group (GMSG) receiving transgenic soy-based diet, and a control group (CG) receiving casein-based diet. All animals received water and isocaloric diet (10% protein), ad libitum for 291 days. After this, the weight of GMSG animals (290.9 ± 9.1 g) was significantly lower (P ≤… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Water and diets were provided ad libitum; food consumption (g) and body mass (g) were recorded daily. We used the Growth Index (GI) as a criterion for protein quality evaluation (Daleprane, Feijó, & Boaventura, 2009;Soares, Lucas, & Boaventura, 2005).…”
Section: Animals and Experimental Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water and diets were provided ad libitum; food consumption (g) and body mass (g) were recorded daily. We used the Growth Index (GI) as a criterion for protein quality evaluation (Daleprane, Feijó, & Boaventura, 2009;Soares, Lucas, & Boaventura, 2005).…”
Section: Animals and Experimental Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to emphasize that GGF 0 and GGF 1 did not receive the L-cistine supplement, so there would be no interference in protein use for the chow based on this variety of soybean, since it is a genetically modified organism. When working with this same soybean, Soares et al (2005) did not find differences in weight variation for the rats which were up to 291 days old. In the present study, it was observed that when dealing with the growth and development period, supplements become essential.…”
Section: Ration Intake(g) Protein Intake (G) Weigth Gain (G) Protein mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The Coefficient of Alimentary Effectiveness (CAE) was determined by taking the weight gain of the test group, after 28 days, in relation to the test group chow consumption, according to Angelis (1995). To prepare the different kinds of chow, both the varieties of soybeans underwent thermal treatment, according to Soares et al (2005), aiming to reduce the antinutritional factors. Chow composition (Table 1) was based on American Institute of Nutrition (AIN) recommendations (Reeves et al, 1993), according to which, all diets had on average 10% protein (1.75% nitrogen) and 363.95 Kcal/100g.…”
Section: Biological Determination Of Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The animals were fed the respective experimental diets for 15 months (455 days). Soares et al (2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%