2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-84042006000400003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass and mineralmass estimates in a "cerrado" ecosystem

Abstract: -(Biomass and mineralmass estimates in a "cerrado" ecosystem). This work aimed to develop allometric equations for tree biomass estimation, and to determine the site biomass in different "cerrado" ecosystems. Destructive sampling in a "campo cerrado" (open savanna) was carried out at the Biological Reserve of Moji-Guaçu, State of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil. This "campo cerrado" (open savanna) grows under a tropical climate and on acid, low nutrient soils. Sixty wood plants were cut to ground level and meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes have generated intense interest in measuring and monitoring carbon (C) pools and fluxes to predict future changes in C concentrations and to develop C management strategies (IPCC 2003(IPCC , 2006Terakupisut et al 2007). Biomass estimates are useful for quantifying net primary productivity, energy pathways, nutrient and C cycles, and harvestable biomass yields, and in evaluating habitats and combustible fuel (Saint-André et al 2005;Delitti et al 2006;Saglan et al 2008). For strategic C management, auditing of national C stocks and fluxes, screening of tree species for C sequestration potential in agroforestry systems, and measurement and monitoring of C stocks in reforestation programmes, require collection of credible biomass data (IPCC 2003;Brown et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes have generated intense interest in measuring and monitoring carbon (C) pools and fluxes to predict future changes in C concentrations and to develop C management strategies (IPCC 2003(IPCC , 2006Terakupisut et al 2007). Biomass estimates are useful for quantifying net primary productivity, energy pathways, nutrient and C cycles, and harvestable biomass yields, and in evaluating habitats and combustible fuel (Saint-André et al 2005;Delitti et al 2006;Saglan et al 2008). For strategic C management, auditing of national C stocks and fluxes, screening of tree species for C sequestration potential in agroforestry systems, and measurement and monitoring of C stocks in reforestation programmes, require collection of credible biomass data (IPCC 2003;Brown et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of regression models and different combinations of variables have been used in the development of predictive models of phytomass for tropical ecosystems (Folster et al 1976, Golley et al 1978, Saldarriaga et al 1988, Brown et al 1989, Overman et al 1994, Moreira-Burger & Delitti 1999, Chave et al 2001, Chave et al 2005, Delitti et al 2006. These models have been applied to quantify nutrient stores, accumulated organic material and potential carbon reserves, to determine vegetation growth rate after perturbation, and to identify determinants of variation in biomass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altura e diâmetro são informações facilmente obtidas em campo. Todas as variáveis têm sido amplamente utilizadas em modelos preditores de biomassa de vegetação arbórea de ecossistemas tropicais (Folster et al 1976, Jordan & Uhl 1978, Golley et al 1978, Tanner 1980, Saldarriaga et al 1988, Brown et al 1989, Martinez-Yrizar et al 1992, Scatena et al 1993, Overman et al 1994, Santos 1996, Moreira-Burger & Delitti 1999, Chave et al 2001, Chave et al 2005, Delitti et al 2006.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…No Brasil os modelos preditores de fitomassa florestal, a partir de métodos destrutivos, concentraramse nas Florestas Amazônicas (Klinge et al 1975, Uhl & Jordan 1984, McWillian et al 1993, Kauffman et al 1994, Santos 1996, Higuchi et al 1998, Nelson et al 1999, Nogueira et al 2007, Nogueira et al 2008. Em menor número, encontram-se os modelos desenvolvidos para outros ecossistemas, tais como: Cerrados (Delitti & Meguro 1984, Castro & Kauffman 1998, Abdala et al 1998, Delitti et al 2006, Caatinga (Sampaio & Silva 2005), Mata Mesófila Semidecídua Ciliar (Moreira- Burger & Delitti 1999), Manguezal (Soares & Novelli 2005) e Mata Atlântica (Burger & Delitti, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified