2017
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-83582017350100029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weeds Hosts of Nematodes in Sugarcane Culture

Abstract: -The presence of weeds and nematodes can affect of sugarcane yield. This research evaluated whether weeds that are very frequent in mechanized harvested sugarcane can be hosts for root-knot nematodes: Meloidogyne incognita or Meloidogyne javanica. Regarding nematode hospitability, ten weed species as well as a control sample (tomato) were evaluated; they were inoculated with M. incognita and M. javanica. The plants were inoculated with 2,000 eggs and second-stage juveniles (J 2 ), and there were three plants p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An exhaustive screening on titles was performed in order to eliminate out-of-scope papers that did not provide useful information for our research (6661 papers). The most common reasons for deleting a paper from the list were the following: the name of a pulse was mentioned only as a comparison of one characteristic to another crop [42], the trial or analysis was performed in intercropping, thus evaluating the impact of the cover crop on the staple food yield [43] or there was no relation to the topic, e.g., papers dealing with biochemical [44] or genetic characteristics [45] or the use of pulse extracts as green fertilizers [46] or seed treatments [47] without any relation to pulse yield or seed quality. Papers with an historical or archeobotanical approach [48] and those stating consumer preferences [49] or the impact of the feed on the animal's health [50] were also excluded.…”
Section: Literature Review and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exhaustive screening on titles was performed in order to eliminate out-of-scope papers that did not provide useful information for our research (6661 papers). The most common reasons for deleting a paper from the list were the following: the name of a pulse was mentioned only as a comparison of one characteristic to another crop [42], the trial or analysis was performed in intercropping, thus evaluating the impact of the cover crop on the staple food yield [43] or there was no relation to the topic, e.g., papers dealing with biochemical [44] or genetic characteristics [45] or the use of pulse extracts as green fertilizers [46] or seed treatments [47] without any relation to pulse yield or seed quality. Papers with an historical or archeobotanical approach [48] and those stating consumer preferences [49] or the impact of the feed on the animal's health [50] were also excluded.…”
Section: Literature Review and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, analyzing the plant mix and the results obtained with the other cover crops, it appears that the use of the plant mix has the same characteristics in the containment and control of nematodes. Leal et al (2012), Debiasi et al (2016) and Giraldeli et al (2017) stated that Crotalaria is a good option for nematode control, as it reduces by up to 80% the incidence of nematodes in areas where the legume is well-formed. Besides providing a significant improvement in the content of organic matter, expanding the biological activity of the soil, they also present the ability to synthesize allelopathic substances and a large number of proteins such as peroxidases, cysteine proteases and inhibitors of cysteine proteases, which contribute to the reduction of phytonematodes (Leal et al, 2012;Debiasi et al, 2016 andGiraldeli et al, 2017).…”
Section: Bidens Pilosamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exhaustive screening on titles was performed in order to eliminate outof-scope papers that did not provide useful information for our research (6661 papers). The most common reasons for deleting a paper from the list were the following: the name of a pulse was mentioned only as a comparison of one characteristic to another crop [40], the trial or analysis was performed in intercropping, thus evaluating the impact of the cover crop on the staple food yield [41], or there was no relation to the topic, e.g. papers dealing with biochemical [42] or genetic characteristics [43] or the use of pulse extracts as green fertilizers [44] or seed treatments [45] without any relation to pulse yield or seed quality.…”
Section: Literature Review and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%