2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-736x2012000900008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caracterização fenogenotípica da resistência antimicrobiana em Staphylococcus spp. isolados de mastite bovina

Abstract: Pesq. Vet. Bras. 32(9)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies reported several phenotypically oxacillin‐resistant isolates that tested negative for mecA gene (Mendonça et al . ; Soares et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported several phenotypically oxacillin‐resistant isolates that tested negative for mecA gene (Mendonça et al . ; Soares et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 62.3% (665/1060) of the samples, at least one bacterial species was isolated, and among them the genus Staphylococci was the most frequent (426/665, 64.1%). The colonization of the udder with coagulase-negative staphylococci is frequently reported in dairy herds, and it may cause mild subclinical mastitis (Mendonça et al 2012, Mork et al 2012). In our study, the cows were not examined for alterations in the mammary gland or the milk somatic cell counts were assessed; therefore, it is not possible to draw any conclusion about the implications of the coagulase-negative staphylococci isolation for the udder's health of the sampled animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, our research results in animal science field concerning to bovine staphylococci beta-lactam resistance does not support that mec A gene plays the same significant role in the detection of this resistance. As a matter of fact, our previous studies reported several phenotypically oxacillin-resistant isolates that tested negative for mec A gene ( Coelho et al , 2009 ; Mendonça et al , 2012 ; Soares et al , 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%