2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-41582006000400004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of fluorescent probes to assess viability of the plant pathogenic bacterium Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis by flow cytometry

Abstract: Determination of the viability of bacteria by the conventional plating technique is a time-consuming process. Methods based on enzyme activity or membrane integrity are much faster and may be good alternatives. Assessment of the viability of suspensions of the plant pathogenic bacterium Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm) using the fluorescent probes Calcein acetoxy methyl ester (Calcein AM), carboxyfluorescein diacetate (cFDA), and propidium iodide (PI) in combination with flow cytometry was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2002) used FCM on plant pathogenic fungi to determine stress and viability on conidia during and after heat treatment. Several authors have used FCM on plant pathogenic bacteria to compare different fluorochromes for viability assessment (Chitarra et al ., 2006; Porter et al ., 1997b), whereas others have tested survival under stress (Ordax et al ., 2006; van Overbeek et al ., 2004). Most of the authors that have compared FCM with plate counts detected more bacteria using FCM (Chitarra et al ., 2006; Ordax et al ., 2006; Porter et al ., 1997b; van Overbeek et al ., 2004); this discrepancy could be as high as 10 8 /mL –1 for bacteria in the VBNC state (Ordax et al ., 2006).…”
Section: Applications Of Fcm In Plant Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2002) used FCM on plant pathogenic fungi to determine stress and viability on conidia during and after heat treatment. Several authors have used FCM on plant pathogenic bacteria to compare different fluorochromes for viability assessment (Chitarra et al ., 2006; Porter et al ., 1997b), whereas others have tested survival under stress (Ordax et al ., 2006; van Overbeek et al ., 2004). Most of the authors that have compared FCM with plate counts detected more bacteria using FCM (Chitarra et al ., 2006; Ordax et al ., 2006; Porter et al ., 1997b; van Overbeek et al ., 2004); this discrepancy could be as high as 10 8 /mL –1 for bacteria in the VBNC state (Ordax et al ., 2006).…”
Section: Applications Of Fcm In Plant Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, propidium iodide (PI) can pass through damaged cell membranes only and form complexes with ds-DNA and RNA. PI-stained cells are assumed to be nonviable (Chitaara et al 2006).…”
Section: Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both plate count and FCM results were positively correlated with the percentage of viable Cmm population. FCM analyses of Calcein AM stained cells may be used as a viability indicator, as this procedure was found to be superior to the plate count method, in addition to the shorter assay time required for FCM analyses (Chitaara et al 2006; Appendix 7).…”
Section: Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…michiganensis (Smith) Davis, Gillaspie, Vidaver & Harris in tomato seed extracts, and Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Pammel) Dowson in cabbage seed extracts (Chitarra et al, 2006). In theory, FCM can replace visual observation and quantification of bacteria in IF cell-staining (Diaper & Edwards, 1994;Bunthof et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…michiganenis and X. campestris pv. campestris (Chitarra et al, 2006). The aim of this work was to evaluate FCM methods for the detection and quantification of Xap in crude bean seed extracts and to compare with IF and dilution plating; to evaluate different fluorescent probes for direct viable count staining of Xap and to develop a FCM sorting method for PCR amplification directly on sorted sample fluid, without the need of DNA purification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%