2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2012000800008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity of cultivated accessions and wild species of rubber tree using EST‑SSR markers

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of EST-SSR markers in the assessment of the genetic diversity of rubber tree genotypes (Hevea brasiliensis) and to verify the transferability of these markers for wild species of Hevea. Forty-five rubber tree accessions from the Instituto Agronômico (Campinas, SP, Brazil) and six wild species were used. Information provided by modified Roger's genetic distance were used to analyze EST-SSR data. UPGMA clustering divided the samples into two major groups… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
3
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The gSSR 268 primer pairs generated the highest number allele per locus (N), polymorphic information content (PIC), observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) while HBE 280 primers generated the lowest for most of the genetic parameters (Table 2). The average number of allele per locus, PIC, Ho and He obtained in this study were higher than those in previously reported results (Feng, Li, Huang, Wang, & Wu, 2009;Triwitayakorn et al, 2011;Perseguini et al, 2012). The differences may be due to the type and the number of populations analyzed in this study from the previous ones.…”
Section: Allelic and Population Genetic Diversitycontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…The gSSR 268 primer pairs generated the highest number allele per locus (N), polymorphic information content (PIC), observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) while HBE 280 primers generated the lowest for most of the genetic parameters (Table 2). The average number of allele per locus, PIC, Ho and He obtained in this study were higher than those in previously reported results (Feng, Li, Huang, Wang, & Wu, 2009;Triwitayakorn et al, 2011;Perseguini et al, 2012). The differences may be due to the type and the number of populations analyzed in this study from the previous ones.…”
Section: Allelic and Population Genetic Diversitycontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, PIC can be used to establish relationships between closely related materials, such as paternity or the probability that parents are heterozygous as well as to know the parents from the progeny genotype (Botstein et al 1980). Perseguini et al (2012) obtained an average of 0.59 (between 0.23 to 0.86), values slightly lower than the present study. This may be related to the EST-SSR marker used.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…DP estimates allow you to select loci that are most likely to differentiate between two individuals. Lower DP values (0.07 to 0.90, with an average of 0.40 per locus) were also detected with EST-SSRs (Perseguini et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Polymorphism information content (PIC) is the measure of discriminatory power of each SSR locus and serves as a measure of the allelic diversity within a locus (George et al, 2004). It measures the ability of an SSR marker to create polymorphism information within a pool of genotypes (Anderson et al, 1993;Perseguini et al, 2012). The formula by Botstein et al (1980) was used to compute the PIC value of each SSR marker: Eq 5.…”
Section: Genetic Properties Of Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%