2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832011000100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permeabilidade ao ar em Latossolo Vermelho sob diferentes sistemas de manejo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
2
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
21
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, N indicated pores supposedly more continuous in the 0.0-0.1 m layer, whereas log K1 showed greater pore continuity in the 0.1-0.2 m layer. In this study, the values of N are below those reported in other studies under NT, where N varied from 1.83 to 9.97 (Ball et al, 1988;Roseberg & McCoy, 1992;Rodrigues et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In that study, N indicated pores supposedly more continuous in the 0.0-0.1 m layer, whereas log K1 showed greater pore continuity in the 0.1-0.2 m layer. In this study, the values of N are below those reported in other studies under NT, where N varied from 1.83 to 9.97 (Ball et al, 1988;Roseberg & McCoy, 1992;Rodrigues et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…As also observed for BD, the K a values in CR were greatest in the 0.0-0.1 m layer. These K a values are lower than those found by Cavalieri et al (2009) and by Rodrigues et al (2011) despite the differences in soil clay content between the soil in those studies and in the present paper.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Desse modo, cerca de 56 % da variabilidade de K a foi explicada pelo modelo da regressão (Quadro 3) -resultado semelhante ao obtido por Rodrigues et al (2011). O índice de continuidade de poros N apresentou diferença não significativa (p>0,05) entre os três sistemas nas quatro primeiras camadas, e somente na camada de 0,4-0,5 m o tratamento PD-E diferiu (F = 6,5878; p = 0,01130) dos demais.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified