Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study by Jain et al, (2008) the sensitivity and specificity of the cefoxitin and oxacillin disk diffusion test were 94.44, 100, 95.83 and 58.33%; respectively. Matos et al, (2010) showed the cefoxitin and oxacillin disk diffusion test and oxacillin agar screening was 100% specific but only the cefoxitin and oxacillin disk diffusion test had 100% sensitivity. Also they found the oxacillin agar screening had the lowest sensitivity (82.2%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In another study by Jain et al, (2008) the sensitivity and specificity of the cefoxitin and oxacillin disk diffusion test were 94.44, 100, 95.83 and 58.33%; respectively. Matos et al, (2010) showed the cefoxitin and oxacillin disk diffusion test and oxacillin agar screening was 100% specific but only the cefoxitin and oxacillin disk diffusion test had 100% sensitivity. Also they found the oxacillin agar screening had the lowest sensitivity (82.2%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This value was similar to the one obtained by Yam et al [13] in the evaluation of a commercial PCR-based method for MRSA detection (83.3%). Our method failed to detect nine isolates, whose oxacillin MICs were lower than 4µg/ml (range of 0.5 to 1µg/ml), values commonly found among community isolates [14]. However, MRSA clinical isolates with very low oxacillin MICs are not common.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The disk diffusion test, which was used in only three studies 15 , 17 , 26 , is the simplest and least expensive assay and presents high sensitivity and specificity for detecting MRSA isolates 28 . However, MIC determination and oxacillin agar screening (OAS) were also used to determine the methicillin resistance in several studies 9 , 15-17 ,.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%