2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0073-47212013000400006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of seasonal changes in daily activity and annual life cycle of Geotrigona mombuca (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in a Cerrado habitat, São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The foraging activity of Geotrigona mombuca Smith, 1863 was studied under natural conditions aiming to verify the influence of seasonal changes on daily flight activity and annual cycle of the colony. Daily flight activity was monitored for a year based on the observation and counting of foragers leaving and entering the hive, as well as the kind of material transported and meteorological factors such as day time, temperature and relative humidity. The influence of seasonal changes was evidenced by a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The foraging activity of subterranean stingless bees seem indeed to be affected by climatic factors. For example, the sister species G. mombuca also has been observed to be affected by temperature and relative humidity (Gobatto & Knoll, 2013). Most likely both subterranean stingless bee species (G. mombuca and G. subterranea) possess similar foraging pattern not only because they are taxonomically closely related each other, but because their populations inhabit similar natural environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The foraging activity of subterranean stingless bees seem indeed to be affected by climatic factors. For example, the sister species G. mombuca also has been observed to be affected by temperature and relative humidity (Gobatto & Knoll, 2013). Most likely both subterranean stingless bee species (G. mombuca and G. subterranea) possess similar foraging pattern not only because they are taxonomically closely related each other, but because their populations inhabit similar natural environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect can be seen in flight activity studies of relatively large species of Melipona, as M. quadrifasciata (Guibu & Imperatriz Fonseca, 1984), M. bicolor bicolor (Hilário et al, 2000), M. scutellaris (Pierrot & Schindwein, 2003;Silva et al, 2011), M. rufiventris (Fidalgo & Kleinert, 2007), M. eburnea (Nates-Parra & Rodriguez, 2011). However other small species of stingless bees, including smaller Melipona presented other pattern of foraging, it is the case of M. marginata (Kleinert-Giovannini & Imperatriz-Fonseca, 1986;Von B Borges & Blochtein, 2005), M. asilvai (Souza et al, 2006), Geotrigona mombuca (Gobatto & Knoll, 2013), Paratrigona subnuda (Mouga, 1984). It is possible that smaller species of Meliponini use floral resources after they have been exploited by larger bees (Silva et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that humidity can change foraging patterns in some bees, such as A. mellifera (Alves et al 2015), Megachilid bees (Abrol 1998), and some stingless bees, such as Plebeia (Kleinert-Giovannini 1982), Tetragonisca (Iwama 1977), Trigona (Contrera et al 2004;Soares et al 2019), Geotrigona (Gobatto and Knoll 2013), Lepidotrigona (Sung et al 2011) and Melipona (Hilário et al 2000;Guibu andImperatriz-Fonseca 1984, Fidalgo andKleinert 2007). In some of these cases, foraging behavior tended to be inversely proportional to relative humidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%