2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0044-59672010000400021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine litter accumulation in Central Amazonian Tropical Rainforest canopy

Abstract: Fine litter dynamics within the canopy differ from litter dynamics on the forest floor for reasons such as differences in microclimate, substrate, disturbance level, stratum influence and decomposition rates. This study is the first attempt to quantify the fine litter accumulated in the canopy of Central Amazonian forests. We compared the canopy litter accumulation to fine litter-layer on forest floor and to other forests and also investigated which were the mostly accumulated litter omponents. We found that C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger litter thicknesses have also been reported, including a mean of 86 mm under Cryptomeria japonica in Japan (Sato et al, 2004). In some kinds of forest, significant amounts of litter also accumulate within the canopy, on the surfaces of branches (Couto-Santos and Luizao, 2010), but this form of litter is not considered here. Leaf litter is continually broken down and decomposed (Gosz et al, 1973), and can also be actively transported downslope (Steart et al, 2006;Abe et al, 2009;Funada et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Nature Of Littermentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Larger litter thicknesses have also been reported, including a mean of 86 mm under Cryptomeria japonica in Japan (Sato et al, 2004). In some kinds of forest, significant amounts of litter also accumulate within the canopy, on the surfaces of branches (Couto-Santos and Luizao, 2010), but this form of litter is not considered here. Leaf litter is continually broken down and decomposed (Gosz et al, 1973), and can also be actively transported downslope (Steart et al, 2006;Abe et al, 2009;Funada et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Nature Of Littermentioning
confidence: 92%
“…From the Lake Tahoe basin, Banwell and Varner (2014) reported litter bulk densities in the range 14.4-43.8 kg/m 3 . Litter loadings vary widely, from <1 t/ha in drylands (Sharafatmandrad et al, 2010) to >10 t/ha in humid forests (Couto-Santos and Luizao, 2010).…”
Section: The Nature Of Littermentioning
confidence: 99%