2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0036-46652008000500015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Textbook of medical Parasitology, Protozoology & Helminthology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 In recent years, PCR has been increasingly used for routine diagnosis of many infectious diseases, including parasitic diseases. By exploiting the genetic differences between E. histolytica and E. dispar, several research groups have developed PCR-based assays for the discrimination of these two species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 In recent years, PCR has been increasingly used for routine diagnosis of many infectious diseases, including parasitic diseases. By exploiting the genetic differences between E. histolytica and E. dispar, several research groups have developed PCR-based assays for the discrimination of these two species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 This leads to a confusing scenario for the defi nite identifi cation and differentiation of E. histolytica from E. moshkovskii and E. dispar in the diagnosis of intestinal amoebiasis. 4 The sensitivity of light microscopy is limited to only 60% at best. 5,6 Isoenzyme analysis of cultured amoebas allows the differentiation of E. histolytica from E. dispar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct examination includes wet mount preparation using saline and iodine, then the concentration method by the formal-ether technique (Cheesbrough, 2009). In addition, modified kinyoun's acid-fast staining (Parija, 2008) ium, Microsporidia ( Jayarani et al, 2014). …”
Section: Examination Of the Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrary, if a very thick stool smear is made by taking relatively a large volume of stool, the smear become too thick to be examined. This is due to a dense background formed by faecal artifacts thereby masking the parasitic ova and cyst that are present, thus making their detection very difficult (Parija 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%