1991
DOI: 10.1590/s0036-46651991000200006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspectos da padronização de testes sorológicos para a doença de Chagas: um teste imunoenzimático para a triagem de doadores de sangue

Abstract: No diagnóstico sorológico da doença de Chagas podem ser encontradas acentuadas divergências mesmo entre laboratórios de grande experiência. Para a padronização de um teste imunoenzimático destinado primariamente à seleção de doadores de sangue foram cuidadosamente escolhidos painéis de soros que se buscaram como representativos das populações de chagásicos e de não chagásicos. Produzido para máxima sensibilidade e estabilidade, o novo reagente (bioELISA - cruzi<A NAME="tx01"></A><A HREF="#nt">… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because it presents high sensitivity and specificity, it is also indicated as the only serological method for seroepidemiological enquiries that can determine the prevalence of the infection [5,[31][32][33]. However, in clinical settings, the result of only 1 serological test is insufficient to diagnose the condition of the chronic T. cruzi carrier [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it presents high sensitivity and specificity, it is also indicated as the only serological method for seroepidemiological enquiries that can determine the prevalence of the infection [5,[31][32][33]. However, in clinical settings, the result of only 1 serological test is insufficient to diagnose the condition of the chronic T. cruzi carrier [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the results obtained are precise since readings are objective, and test validation criteria and interpretation of results are rigorous. The majority of the commercially available ELISAs employ antigens obtained by lysis of epimastogote or trypomastigote forms of T. cruzi (3,9). These tests are sensitive but often fail to distinguish between T. cruzi-specific and Leishmania sp.-specific antibodies, thus leading frequently to false-positive results (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). This higher diagnostic resolution of the IIF-A in relation to IIF-E, as well as to other serologic tests with epimastigote antigens (12,16), is significant. This type of serologic profile which gives high diagnostic resolution is usually seen when monoclonal or recombinant antigens are used in the tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%