1999
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89101999000500008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confiabilidade diagnóstica dos transtornos mentais da versão para cuidados primários da Classificação Internacional das Doenças

Abstract: VOLUME 33 NÚMERO 5 OUTUBRO 1999© Copyright Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP. Proibida a reprodução mesmo que parcial sem a devida autorização do Editor Científico. Proibida a utilização de matérias para fins comerciais. All rights reserved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For anxiety disorders, the increase in prevalence is even more significant, rising from 7% in the 80s [ 40 ] to 21% in 2007 [ 43 ]. Several factors may have contributed to an increase in the identification of cases in the community, both by individuals and by health professionals, such as better-defined diagnostic classifications [ 44 ], campaigns aimed at reducing stigma, and greater access to information about mental illness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For anxiety disorders, the increase in prevalence is even more significant, rising from 7% in the 80s [ 40 ] to 21% in 2007 [ 43 ]. Several factors may have contributed to an increase in the identification of cases in the community, both by individuals and by health professionals, such as better-defined diagnostic classifications [ 44 ], campaigns aimed at reducing stigma, and greater access to information about mental illness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy rates (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and accuracy) were evaluated through the software CATMAKER 15 . Concordance between the 2 methods was evaluated through the coefficient of agreement Kappa ( k ) 16 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Studies using current psychiatric classifications of somatization confirmed the difficulties involving these diagnoses, concerning both the inter-rater reliability and the suitability of assessment instruments, whose sensitivity to detect somatoform disorders is low. 27,32 3. Prevalence studies [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] …”
Section: This Decision Was Taken However With the Purpose Of Providmentioning
confidence: 99%