2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-76122008000500004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gestão de desempenho por competências: integrando a gestão por competências, o balanced scorecard e a avaliação 360 graus

Abstract: Este artigo avalia a percepção de funcionários do Banco do Brasil acerca do novo modelo de gestão de desempenho adotado pela empresa. A pesquisa, de caráter descritivo e exploratório, utilizou-se de questionário semi-estruturado para coleta de dados quantitativos e qualitativos. A amostra foi constituída por 532 funcionários de nove unidades do banco, nas quais o modelo foi implementado para fins de validação. Foram realizadas análises descritivas, de variância e fatorial entre as variáveis componentes do estu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
56

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
56
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several tools to assess management performance, namely direct assessment by the immediate leader, objective evaluation, joint evaluation between the appraiser and the appraised, competency assessment, self-assessment, 180-degree feedback and 360-degree feedback (9)(10) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several tools to assess management performance, namely direct assessment by the immediate leader, objective evaluation, joint evaluation between the appraiser and the appraised, competency assessment, self-assessment, 180-degree feedback and 360-degree feedback (9)(10) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered a 360-degree method because the same collaborator can be evaluated by all or most of the members of a team -managers, directors and peers -in order to obtain as much information as possible to identify improvement opportunities of the collaborator's performance. This form of performance appraisal has been used by several organizations to identify strengths and weaknesses, correct attitudes that impair acceptable professional performance, and provide information about the future, which in turn enables self-development and the development of the service and the organization (9) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment by the subordinate also favors the development objectives, since the subordinate is in a suitable position to assess, in frequent contact with the reviewed, from where it can be observed many behaviors related to performance (Bohlander, Snell & Sherman, 2003). The assumption, therefore is that the assessment carried out by various players is richer and more trustworthy than the one carried out by a single individual, since it aims to get more information on the employee performance, but above all, because people involved start to share the responsibility for the process and possible distortions in the perception of one of the evaluators are diluted in the assessments carried out by the remaining evaluators (Brandão et al, 2008).…”
Section: Dutra (2004) Developed a Methods Of Assessing Individual Compmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three mentioned methods -the model of Dutra (2004), the BSC of Kaplan and Norton (1997) and the 360-degree assessment -possess their peculiarities, advantages and disadvantages (Brandão et al, 2008). It is not the purpose here to explore them.…”
Section: Dutra (2004) Developed a Methods Of Assessing Individual Compmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essa vertente integradora possui aceitação mais ampla por considerar as diversas dimensões do trabalho e associar a competência tanto à capacidade quanto ao desempenho (Brandão et al, 2008).…”
Section: De Acordo Com O Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (Gem)unclassified