2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-737x2010000500019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eficiência de adubos fosfatados associados ao enxofre elementar na cultura do milho

Abstract: The agronomic efficiency of phosphate fertilizers may be affected by phosphorus sources, soil properties, application methods and plant species. The objective of this work was to compare the efficiency of natural reactive phosphate (NRP) and triple super-phosphate (TSP) associated with elemental sulfur applied in the planting furrow of corn. The experiment was conducted in an Oxisol, in the city of Toledo-PR. The treatments were arranged in a randomized block design, in a factorial scheme 2x4x2, with two P sou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed no relationship between the S content of leaf tissue and the relative grain yield of five different crops spanning 31 crop harvests (Figure 7). Some authors found that S in leaf tissue increased with S application to soil; however, this effect resulted in no increase in grain yield (Rheinheimer et al, 2005;Frandoloso et al, 2010;Moda et al, 2013). Therefore, using leaf tissue analysis alone to guide S application requires caution because annual crops tend to take up nutrients in amounts exceeding their basic nutritional requirements (luxury consumption) (Ercoli et al, 2011).…”
Section: Sulfur Content Of Leaf Tissue and Grain Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results showed no relationship between the S content of leaf tissue and the relative grain yield of five different crops spanning 31 crop harvests (Figure 7). Some authors found that S in leaf tissue increased with S application to soil; however, this effect resulted in no increase in grain yield (Rheinheimer et al, 2005;Frandoloso et al, 2010;Moda et al, 2013). Therefore, using leaf tissue analysis alone to guide S application requires caution because annual crops tend to take up nutrients in amounts exceeding their basic nutritional requirements (luxury consumption) (Ercoli et al, 2011).…”
Section: Sulfur Content Of Leaf Tissue and Grain Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entretanto, elevaram-se de forma linear em função do aumento das proporções de Sº (Figura 6D). Considerando os baixos teores de P normalmente presentes no resíduo de vermiculita (SOUSA; MACHADO; LEITE, 2011), esse fato ocorreu, provavelmente, em razão do aumento dos teores de sulfato no solo, visto que esse ânion compete pelos mesmos sítios de fixação de P no solo, ocasionando menor fixação de P e, consequentemente, aumento nos teores de P disponível (FRANDOLOSO et al, 2010). Adicionalmente, é possível que a acidificação do solo pelo Sº tenha aumentado a solubilidade de fosfatos fixados como fosfatos de cálcio no solo (HASHEMIMAJD; FARANI;…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…The fact that the control treatment also presenting foliar P content (2.63 g•kg In this sense, the results obtained differ from literature reports. For example, Frandoloso et al [9], upon evaluating the efficiency of phosphate fertilizers on corn culture, it was observed average foliar P content of 2.7 g•kg −1 with the application of triple superphosphate and 2.4 g•kg −1 with the use of reactive natural phosphate of Gafsa. Ourives et al [20] reported that the organic fertilizer Bokashi In the third crop, with soy over the residual phosphate fertilization provided initially, foliar P contents were 3.22 and 2.17 g•kg −1 for the average of factorial treatments and control treatment, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reactive natural phosphates are phosphorus sources that have intermediate solubility between soluble P sources (as in the example of triple superphosphate) and the Brazilian rock natural phosphates [8] [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%