Aplicação do Modelo Calgary para avaliação de famílias de isodos na prática clínica

Abstract

This qualitative study has as objective to present the experience to assessment of the families of dependent aged under the systemic approach. The Calgary Model was used as theoretical framework and as methodological strategy the case study. The data had been collected with five families of dependent older person, from September of December of 2005, by means of the instrument elaborated previously. The application of this model allowed doing the familiar analysis raising the main aspects of its structure, development and functioning. We believe that the nurse must search endorsement in the scientific literature and adopts pertinent instruments to contribute for the development of its abilities to do the familiar approach.

Genogram and ecomap: brazilian nursing contributions

“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In 20052, [16][17][18][19] 24 Except one, 37 all papers included in the review used the genogram and ecomap as complementary tools for research data collection. One paper was identified in which the contribution of the genogram and the ecomap was explored in undergraduate nursing education and in childcare.…”

“…Papers were identified with "families" of: elderly people; 10,12,24,32 pregnant women with human papillomavirus; 23,27 women with human papillomavirus, in the form of a case study; 11 adults with arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus; 8 nursing faculty members; 29 children who were victims of violence; 31 children with cancer 2 and chronic kidney failure; [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] patients with mental disorders; 3,14,28 users registered in the Family Health Program; 19 adults with chronic kidney failure; 13 hospitalized patients; 20 adolescent parents; 7 people living in rural areas 36 and, in one study, to understand the family context in the health-disease process. 25 "Individually", these instruments were used: with mental health service users; 15 with mothers of premature children; 6,21 mothers of pre-adolescents; 17 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury; 18 children in early childhood; 26 children with nephrotic syndrome; 30 stoma patients; 22 elderly people [33][34] and young victims of violence.…”

“…25 "Individually", these instruments were used: with mental health service users; 15 with mothers of premature children; 6,21 mothers of pre-adolescents; 17 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury; 18 children in early childhood; 26 children with nephrotic syndrome; 30 stoma patients; 22 elderly people [33][34] and young victims of violence. 35 With regard to its construction, in seven papers, the genogram and ecomap were elaborated based on an individual interview; 6,[17][18]21,23,33,35 in 17 during group meetings; [2][3][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][19][20][28][29]32,34 and, in three, 22,24,30 both individual and group interviews were used. In seven papers, 7,25-27,31,36-37 the authors did not mention how the instruments were constructed.…”

“…Among the papers selected, in 19, the interviews were held at home, 3,6,8,10,12,[17][18][19]21,24,[26][27][28][29][32][33][34][35][36] in five at the health service 9,13,15,20,23 and, in six, both at home and at the health service. 2,11,16,22,25,30 In four papers, the place where the interviews were held was not mentioned.…”

“…2,11,16,22,25,30 In four papers, the place where the interviews were held was not mentioned. 7,14,31,37 As regards the meetings with the families, in nine papers, 2,6,[9][10][11]20,28,32,36 it was mentioned that the data collection resulted from different meetings with the family; in one paper, a single meeting was sufficient to collect the data; 12 in two, it was reported that, first, a relation had to be established with the family; 19,22 in four, the construction of these instruments started during the initial contact with the family members. [2][3]17,36 The other 18 papers did not mention how these meetings took place.…”