2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-70942007000400003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Continuous femoral nerve block is a useful technique to manage postoperative pain after ACL repair. A rate of 5 mL.h-1 in CI or PCA boluses assures excellent postoperative analgesia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation of the present trial was the use of adjunctive analgesics (diclofenac and tramadol) that were different from similar studies that used IV ketoprofen and morphine or IV propacetamol followed by 10–20 mg of IM piritramide, which is a synthetic μ‐agonist opioid [5, 15]. Such diversity did not allow the reliable comparison of the analgesic efficacy of PCA applications among different studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another limitation of the present trial was the use of adjunctive analgesics (diclofenac and tramadol) that were different from similar studies that used IV ketoprofen and morphine or IV propacetamol followed by 10–20 mg of IM piritramide, which is a synthetic μ‐agonist opioid [5, 15]. Such diversity did not allow the reliable comparison of the analgesic efficacy of PCA applications among different studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The present prospective randomized clinical trial discovered that patient controlled perineural femoral infusion of on‐demand 0.1 % bupivacaine boluses combined with basal infusion provided more efficient postoperative pain control than on‐demand boluses alone during 48 h after ACL reconstruction. The scarce literature reports in patients after ACL reconstruction describe that a PCA regimen with on‐demand boluses of bupivacaine was associated with lower consumption of local anesthetic than a regimen with basal infusion plus on‐demand boluses, and there was no difference in the quality of analgesia [5, 6, 15]. In the present trial, a lower concentration of bupivacaine was used and no additives were deployed; nevertheless, the consumption of bupivacaine during the postoperative 48 h was lower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 95 potentially eligible citations had their full‐text versions retrieved for screening. Of these, 34 were excluded due to their lack of randomised nature or being a crossover design (n = 2) [35, 36]; having an ineligible surgery or not having data for the ACL subgroup (n = 5) [37–41]; not having an active comparator group (n = 2) [42, 43]; or being the only study identified evaluating the specific comparison (n = 25) [44–68]. Subsequently, a total of 61 [69–129] full text randomised trials were considered for inclusion; however, after additional review, four [125–128] were excluded due to evaluating a technique that was not attached to any of the other nodes in the network.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os esquemas analgésicos utilizados foram: infusão contínua de analgesia (infusão de 5mL/hora); bolos de analgesia controlada pelo paciente (PCA, sigla do inglês patient-controlled analgesia) com intervalo de 30 minutos. (64) O tratamento específico, voltado as necessidades de um determinado grupo de pacientes ou procedimentos, pode contribuir significativamente para o tratamento adequado e seguro da dor no POI.…”
Section: Tabela 13 -Consenso Para a Avaliação Dos Itens Do Manual Opeunclassified