2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0021-75572008000200009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fototerapia causa danos ao DNA de leucócitos mononucleares periféricos em recém-nascidos a termo

Abstract: Objective: Our aim was to determine whether endogenous mononuclear leukocyte DNA strand is a target of phototherapy. Methods:The study included 65 term infants aged between 3-10 days that had been exposed to intensive (n = 23) or conventional (n = 23) phototherapy for at least 48 hours due to neonatal jaundice, and a control group (n = 19). DNA damage was assayed by single-cell alkaline gel electrophoresis (comet assay). Plasma total antioxidant capacity and total oxidant status levels were also measured, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we attempted to morphologically evaluate apoptosis using the neutral comet assay. In addition, most studies investigated the effects of jaundice and/or phototherapy on DNA damage in neonates using the alkaline comet assay[3,5,6,11], which allows the detection of both single and DSBs[37]. In contrast, the present study used the neutral comet assay that has the ability to detect only DSBs, which are more important than single strand breaks to induce chromosomal aberrations[38] and apoptotic responses at the cellular level[21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we attempted to morphologically evaluate apoptosis using the neutral comet assay. In addition, most studies investigated the effects of jaundice and/or phototherapy on DNA damage in neonates using the alkaline comet assay[3,5,6,11], which allows the detection of both single and DSBs[37]. In contrast, the present study used the neutral comet assay that has the ability to detect only DSBs, which are more important than single strand breaks to induce chromosomal aberrations[38] and apoptotic responses at the cellular level[21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her lamdan rastgele en az 25 hücre sayıldı ve her görüntü kuyruklu yıldız kuyruğundaki floresan yoğunluğuna göre sınıflandırıldı. Skorlamada 0, 1, 2, 3 veya 4 (Skor 0: hasar görmemiş, Skor 4: maksimum hasar görmüş) değerleri kullanıldı [20,21]. [22].…”
Section: Genotoksisite (Dna Hasarı) çAlışmalarıunclassified