2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2002000100027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sarcoma de Ewing epidural lombar primário: Relato de caso

Abstract: Relatamos o caso de uma jovem de 15 anos, com quadro de paraparesia de inicio agudo, secundário a processo expansivo epidural na coluna lombar, cujo diagnóstico histopatológico foi consistente com sarcoma de Ewing, sem envolvimento ósseo. Revisando a literatura encontramos apenas outros 17 casos de sarcoma de Ewing extra-esquelético de localização primária no espaço epidural raqueano.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thoracolumbar spine is most commonly affected and cervical involvement is rare. On MRI, these lesions commonly appear isointense to muscle on T1weighted images, hyperintense on T2 weighted images and show moderate enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1 weighted images without bony involvement [14] [15]. These data had been found in our case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thoracolumbar spine is most commonly affected and cervical involvement is rare. On MRI, these lesions commonly appear isointense to muscle on T1weighted images, hyperintense on T2 weighted images and show moderate enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1 weighted images without bony involvement [14] [15]. These data had been found in our case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…By now, 106 cases[1–5791214161719232532363841505254566266–6870717377–798184869092939597–113115116] of primary intraspinal EES/pPNET (extradural/intradural extramedullary lesions) and 29 cases[31118202228353740515255697172808283859194114] of primary intramedullary PNET (CNS-PNET) have been reported in the literature [Tables 1 and 2]. In some studies, neither intra- nor extramedullary location of the tumor was mentioned, so they were not included in any of the groups in our review (i.e.…”
Section: Results Of the Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%