2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492013000100011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of ocular surface toxicity after topical instillation of nitric oxide donors

Abstract: Ethic committee from UNIFESP: number 1573/08. ABSTRACTPurpose: To evaluate the ocular surface toxicity of two nitric oxide donors in ex vivo and in vivo animal models: S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) and S-nitroso-Nace tylcysteine (SNAC) in a hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) matrix at final concentrations 1.0 and 10.0 mM. Methods: Ex vivo GSNO and SNAC toxicities were clinically and histologically ana lyzed using freshly excised pig eyeballs. In vivo experiments were performed with 20 albino rabbits which were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35 The in vivo safety of different NO donors, such as S-nitrosoglutathione and S-nitroso-Nacetylcysteine, was also demonstrated up to 10 mM concentration in rabbit eyes. 36 In contrast, we observed that SNP exposure showed a dose dependent and significant cytotoxic effect on HCEC even with a relatively low concentration (1 lM). This finding is consistent with the previous report that SNP ( 500 lM) was toxic to mammalian cells.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…35 The in vivo safety of different NO donors, such as S-nitrosoglutathione and S-nitroso-Nacetylcysteine, was also demonstrated up to 10 mM concentration in rabbit eyes. 36 In contrast, we observed that SNP exposure showed a dose dependent and significant cytotoxic effect on HCEC even with a relatively low concentration (1 lM). This finding is consistent with the previous report that SNP ( 500 lM) was toxic to mammalian cells.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The chemosis, lids closed/open, swelling, discharge and redness of the conjunctiva were graded on a scale from 0 to 3; iris (swelling and hyperemia) was graded on a scale from 0 to 2; and cornea (irritation, opacity until ulceration) was graded on a scale from 0 to 4, as previously described. 94 , 95 In accordance with the UN GHS/ European Union Regulation on Classification, Labelling and Packaging classification system, the sum of the score was then used to classify genipin based on the severity of effects and timing of reversibility of effects. 94 , 95 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 94 , 95 In accordance with the UN GHS/ European Union Regulation on Classification, Labelling and Packaging classification system, the sum of the score was then used to classify genipin based on the severity of effects and timing of reversibility of effects. 94 , 95 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also capable of transnitrosating cysteine residues of proteins and exerts a marked microbicidal action [20] , [21] . These combined properties of GSNO, in addition to its miscibility in non-toxic and mucoadhesive hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC; a pharmaceutical vehicle) [22] , make HPMC/GSNO formulations a promising option for investigating the effects of local NO-donor administration on the course of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced oral mucositis, which is the purpose of the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%