2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492003000600007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity, retinal motion and the control of prehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the fact that we find performance to be affected by an illusion in the processing of binocular disparity is interesting, given its important role in the visual control of prehension. Consistent with these results, we have also established that prehension is subject to similar biases in the recovery of shape and distance from binocular information as are well known in the perceptual domain (Johnston 1991;Bradshaw and Hibbard 2003;Hibbard and Bradshaw 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the fact that we find performance to be affected by an illusion in the processing of binocular disparity is interesting, given its important role in the visual control of prehension. Consistent with these results, we have also established that prehension is subject to similar biases in the recovery of shape and distance from binocular information as are well known in the perceptual domain (Johnston 1991;Bradshaw and Hibbard 2003;Hibbard and Bradshaw 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%