2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27302011000700011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postglucose growth hormone nadir and insulin-like growth factor-1 in naïve-active acromegalic patients: do these parameters always correlate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we observed no significant differences of plasma growth hormone levels in the CPO group compared with the placebo group. We also evaluated IGF-1 levels at baseline and after 8 weeks of supplementation because IGF-1 levels reflect growth hormone secretion [15]. No statistically significant difference between CPO and placebo groups was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, we observed no significant differences of plasma growth hormone levels in the CPO group compared with the placebo group. We also evaluated IGF-1 levels at baseline and after 8 weeks of supplementation because IGF-1 levels reflect growth hormone secretion [15]. No statistically significant difference between CPO and placebo groups was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the direct effects of growth hormone to several tissues, it also elicits indirect effects mediated by insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) [12]. Plasma IGF-1 levels correlate with plasma growth hormone levels, as production of IGF-1 by the liver is stimulated by growth hormone [14,15]. Similar to growth hormone, IGF-1 activates cell growth in several tissues including bone [16], muscle [17], and skin [18,19], whereby it contributes to both epidermal or dermal skin development and maintenance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In part, the differences in the published cut-offs are related to differences in the assays used, although most guidelines do not specify the assay used to generate the GH concentrations stated. Some authors have published convincing evidence that prevalence of acromegaly as well as percentages for remission largely depend on cut-off values used [ 60 , 61 , 64 , 65 , 69 , 70 ]. More recent publications on studies using modern, more specific GH assays calibrated against the latest recombinant standard clearly indicated that the above mentioned cut.-off of 1 ng/mL is inappropriately high and should be adapted for modern assays.…”
Section: Impact Of Molecular Heterogeneity On Gh Measurement In Clinimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In treatment-naïve, biochemically active patients, discordance appears to be greatest in those with only mildly elevated GH output, leading to a high false negative rate with GH suppression measurement [19]. Increased discordance is also seen at the other extreme in patients with particularly high GH levels [20]. In patients treated with pegvisomant, only IGF-1 remains a reliable marker of disease activity, as GH concentrations remain elevated [3, 16].…”
Section: Biochemical Versus Symptom Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%