2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0001-37652008000100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evidence for hippocampal long-term potentiation as a basis of memory for simple tasks

Abstract: Long-term potentiation (LTP) is the enhancement of postsynaptic responses for hours, days or weeks following the brief repetitive afferent stimulation of presynaptic afferents. It has been proposed many times over the last 30 years to be the basis of long-term memory. Several recent findings finally supported this hypothesis: a) memory formation of one-trial avoidance learning depends on a series of molecular steps in the CA1 region of the hippocampus almost identical to those of LTP in the same region; b) hip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
1
17
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…LTP-like synaptic enhancement occurs at thalamo-cortical synapses during perceptual learning on a visual task (Cooke and Bear 2012) and in the hippocampal CA1 region during inhibitory avoidance learning (Whitlock et al 2006). The molecular requirement for experimental models of neuronal plasticity, experience-dependent forms of plasticity, and memory overlap significantly (Izquierdo et al 2008;Smith et al 2009;Ye and Carew 2010;Johansen et al 2011;Korb and Finkbeiner 2011), and altering this requirement by molecular manipulations frequently alters all three processes (Nedivi 1999). Accordingly, CaN inhibition enhances memory, whether achieved pharmacologically (Christie-Fougere et al 2009), by expression of a CaN inhibitor in forebrain excitatory neurons (Malleret et al 2001;Baumgartel et al 2008), or through antisense oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown, applied pre-training (Ikegami and Inokuchi 2000) or post-training (Gerdjikov and Beninger 2005).…”
Section: Basic Properties Of Canmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LTP-like synaptic enhancement occurs at thalamo-cortical synapses during perceptual learning on a visual task (Cooke and Bear 2012) and in the hippocampal CA1 region during inhibitory avoidance learning (Whitlock et al 2006). The molecular requirement for experimental models of neuronal plasticity, experience-dependent forms of plasticity, and memory overlap significantly (Izquierdo et al 2008;Smith et al 2009;Ye and Carew 2010;Johansen et al 2011;Korb and Finkbeiner 2011), and altering this requirement by molecular manipulations frequently alters all three processes (Nedivi 1999). Accordingly, CaN inhibition enhances memory, whether achieved pharmacologically (Christie-Fougere et al 2009), by expression of a CaN inhibitor in forebrain excitatory neurons (Malleret et al 2001;Baumgartel et al 2008), or through antisense oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown, applied pre-training (Ikegami and Inokuchi 2000) or post-training (Gerdjikov and Beninger 2005).…”
Section: Basic Properties Of Canmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, SC animals did not demand the fear-conditioning circuits to avoid the shock, since their areas related to attention and memory consolidation (cortex and hippocampus) were intact [28]. There is evidence that LTP occurs in Py and DG [39,40] and also that 7 receptors are involved with this process [1,3,5].…”
Section: Relationship Between Increases In 7 Density and Memory Maintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hippocampal formation (HF) is critical to memory and cognition (Blozovski, 1983; Izquierdo et al, 2008), and mediates the influences of nicotine on memory (Blozovski, 1985; Davis et al, 2007). The HF includes four main subregions (Amaral and Witter, 1995); the dentate gyrus, the hippocampal proper (including CA1, CA2 and CA3 regions), the subicular complex (including subiculum (Sb)), and the entorhinal cortex (EC; including layers I through VI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each subregion plays distinct roles in memory and cognition (Hunsaker et al, 2008; Li and Chao, 2008). Thus far, investigations regarding the influence of nicotine on hippocampal neurons have been focused on the hippocampal proper and dentate regions (Alkondon and Albuquerque, 2001; Fayuk and Yakel, 2004, 2005; Frazier et al, 1998a, 1998b; Jones and Yakel, 1997; Khiroug et al, 2003; Klein and Yakel, 2005; McQuiston and Madison, 1999; Sudweeks and Yakel, 2000; Welsby et al, 2007); this is likely due to the well-studied role of this region in learning and memory (Chen et al, 2006; Hasselmo, 2005; Hunsaker et al, 2008; Izquierdo et al, 2008; Lee et al, 2005; Li and Chao, 2008) and the ability of nicotine to induce synaptic potentiation (Fujii et al, 1999, 2000; Gray et al, 1996; He et al, 2003; Hunter et al, 1994; Matsuyama et al, 2000; Sawada et al, 1994). However, whether nicotine influences neurons in either the subicular complex or EC is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%