2018
DOI: 10.1590/es0101-73302018179272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O DIÁLOGO INTERCULTURAL ENTRE FREIRE & DEWEY: O SUL E O NORTE NAS MATRIZES (PÓS)-COLONIAIS DAS AMÉRICAS

Abstract: RESUMO: Este artigo empreende uma análise intercultural dos textos de Paulo Freire e John Dewey, tendo em conta os seus contextos culturais e epistemológicos, no enquadramento de duas matrizes (pós)-coloniais distintas, que constituíram os cenários intelectuais e as bagagens sócio-históricas das obras desses autores. Procura, assim, acrescentar uma perspectiva intercultural e pós-colonial sobre os seus fundamentos filosóficos e epistemológicos aos estudos comparativos das suas obras que se têm concentrado apen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Byram and Guilherme's approaches differ, from the beginning, in that, Byram's approach to critical awareness in language and culture education may be characterised as pragmatist, of a Deweyan kind, while Guilherme's was inspired by the utopian work of Paulo Freire. Guilherme adopts Freire's sense of utopia, understood as the accomplishment of the " inédito viável " that she translates into the "[viable unknown] the 'not yet' that is still deemed feasible" ( Guilherme 2017a( Guilherme : 431, 2017b( Guilherme , 2018. Not that Byram's and Guilherme's proposals ultimately separate in what concerns their perceptions of active democracy or intercultural dialogue, but that their conceptions of the cultural and the intercultural clearly emanate from different cultural matrices, and therefore intercultural matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Byram and Guilherme's approaches differ, from the beginning, in that, Byram's approach to critical awareness in language and culture education may be characterised as pragmatist, of a Deweyan kind, while Guilherme's was inspired by the utopian work of Paulo Freire. Guilherme adopts Freire's sense of utopia, understood as the accomplishment of the " inédito viável " that she translates into the "[viable unknown] the 'not yet' that is still deemed feasible" ( Guilherme 2017a( Guilherme : 431, 2017b( Guilherme , 2018. Not that Byram's and Guilherme's proposals ultimately separate in what concerns their perceptions of active democracy or intercultural dialogue, but that their conceptions of the cultural and the intercultural clearly emanate from different cultural matrices, and therefore intercultural matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crucially, however, their approaches to knowledge construction in education differ in that Dewey adopts a pragmatic 'problem solving approach' while Freire concentrates his attention on a resisting 'problem posing approach.' Each of them relies on 'experience' and 'experiment' in very different historical and cultural social contexts, which result from different colonial matrices (Guilherme, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%