2017
DOI: 10.1590/es0101-73302017165522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Edla Eggert 2RESUMO: Este artigo explora uma falácia, chamada "ideologia de gênero", que aflorou nas discussões sobre os atuais Planos de Educação. Revisita os principais marcos internacionais e nacionais surgidos desde 1948 relativos aos direitos humanos, à educação, à igualdade de gênero e à erradicação da discriminação e violência motivadas por gênero, orientação sexual e identidade de gênero. Examina argumentos de segmentos reacionários e/ou acríticos da sociedade contra a inclusão desses temas nos Planos.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
31

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
31
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Beauvoir and Butler are seen as the intellectual matrix of what conservatives 2 refer to as "gender ideology", and suffer strong opposition to their formulations. As Corrêa (2018), Miskolci and Campana (2017) and Reis and Eggert (2017), among others have indicated, "Gender Ideology" is a term that was first propelled onto a global level in 1995, by the reaction of the Catholic Church leadership to the World Conference on Women in Beijing, when the word "woman" began to be substituted by the word "gender" (Almeida, 2018:35). With the passage of time, this discourse was taken up by other Christian sectors and gained social capillarity in countries such as Poland, Hungary, the United States, France, Columbia, Peru, Argentina and Brazil. The toughest confrontations over gender in Brazil are in the institutional sphere, in the legislative and executive branches (Mano, 2019:15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Beauvoir and Butler are seen as the intellectual matrix of what conservatives 2 refer to as "gender ideology", and suffer strong opposition to their formulations. As Corrêa (2018), Miskolci and Campana (2017) and Reis and Eggert (2017), among others have indicated, "Gender Ideology" is a term that was first propelled onto a global level in 1995, by the reaction of the Catholic Church leadership to the World Conference on Women in Beijing, when the word "woman" began to be substituted by the word "gender" (Almeida, 2018:35). With the passage of time, this discourse was taken up by other Christian sectors and gained social capillarity in countries such as Poland, Hungary, the United States, France, Columbia, Peru, Argentina and Brazil. The toughest confrontations over gender in Brazil are in the institutional sphere, in the legislative and executive branches (Mano, 2019:15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No documento final aprovado pelo Congresso e sancionado pela presidenta (Brasil, 2014) prevaleceu a flexão de gênero, mas foi retirada a referência que especificava a promoção da igualdade racial, regional, de gênero e de orientação sexual. O mesmo debate se repetiu em diversas assembleias legislativas e câmaras municipais e resultou na exclusão da menção às desigualdades de gênero e orientação sexual em parte significativa dos planos estaduais e municipais de educação em todo o país (Reis e Eggert, 2017).…”
unclassified
“…The two legislative houses had previously voted to withdraw all content related to gender and sexuality from the National Education Plan (the Senate in 2013 and the Chamber in 2014). Reis and Eggert (2017) look at how the National Education Plan was formulated: on December 20, 2010, the proposal for the new National Education Plan was presented to the Chamber of Deputies. After almost two years, the proposal passed the House and was sent to the Senate, maintaining the deliberations of the national education conferences regarding gender equity and respect for sexual diversity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this retrospective presented in RIC 565/2015, the Chamber of Deputies confirmed these changes by vote on April 22, 2014, with the bill becoming Law 13,005 / 2014, establishing the National Education Plan (PNE), sanctioned by President of the Republic on June 25, 2014. However, the final document of the National Conference on Education (CONAE -2014) maintained the sections on overcoming gender and sexual orientation inequalities and on "promoting ethnic-racial, gender, and sexual orientation diversity" (Brazil, 2014). Another reaction to the law establishing the new National Education Plan came from the Ministry of Education and the National Education Council, which published notes in 2015 criticizing the omission of actions that included the promotion of gender equality and respect for sexual diversity (Reis, Eggert, 2017). However, according to these authors, an alliance of conservative Catholics and evangelical Christians, as well as other civil society organizations, mobilized and accused state and municipal authorities of including "gender and sexual diversity ideology" in local education plans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%