Management framework paradigms for disorders of sex development

Abstract

Until 2005, questions regarding medical treatment and diagnostic information on Disorders of Sex Development (DSD) were not systematically discussed with both the patients and their families; however, the way these patients are currently treated have been changing with time. Interventional changes in the clinical-psychotherapeutic-surgical areas of DSD determine not only different medical recommendations but also help to place the patient and the family into the decisional process of therapy. We must consider two paradigmatic periods that have influenced and transformed the clinical management framework of patients with DSD: a) The "Money era" (1955), which emphasized the role of the gonads as the diagnostic criterion, having the environment as determinant of the sex identity; and b) The Chicago Consensus (2005) phase, in which the role of genetics and molecular biology was critical for an early identification, as well as in building a proper sex identity, emphasizing ethical questions and the "stigma culture" . In addition, recent data have focused on the importance of interdisciplinarity and statements on questions concerning Human Rights as key factors in treatment decision making. Despite each of these management models being able to determine specific directions and recommendations regarding the clinical handling of these patients, we verify that a composite of these several models is the clinical routine nowadays. In the present paper, we discuss these several paradigms, and pinpoint clinical differences and their unfolding regarding management of DSD patients and their families. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2015;59(5):383-90

Psychological Aspects of Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome: Two Cases Illustrating Therapeutical Challenges

“…The EuroDSD consortium, the International Disorder of Sex Development (I-DSD) Registry, and the aforementioned AR gene mutation database are great international initiatives that have contributed a lot in this DSD entity, opening a new, promising path for a more holistic management [2, 7, 18, 19]. Nevertheless, longitudinal studies are urgently needed to clarify obscure points in the optimal management of AIS, such as quality of life, sex assignment, and long-term outcomes.…”

Disorders of sex differentiation: state of the problem 15 years after the Chicago consensus

“…Некоторые авторы [71] рассматривали Консенсус в качестве начала «новой эры» в оказании медицинской помощи больным с НПР, которая пришла на смену старой -«эре Money». Последняя характеризовалась тем, что врачи в своей практике руководствовались теорией John Money о превосходстве воспитания над природой (или окружающей среды над биологией) при формировании половой идентичности, а Консенсус изменил парадигму -после него приоритет стали отдавать биологии и «междисциплинарности».…”

Neonatal Sex Assignment in Disorders of Sex Development: A Philosophical Introspection

“…[11] Paradigm shift of the conference was emphasis on sex assignment based on genetic and molecular criteria rather than gonadal function. [12] Old terms such as hermaphroditism, intersex and ambiguous sex were discarded in favour of the newly proposed nomenclature "disorders of sex development (DSD)". Unfortunately, even after a decade of consensus statement, controversies refuse to die down.…”