2016
DOI: 10.1590/2317-4889201620150012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U-Pb zircon ages of rocks from the Amazonas Territory of Colombia and their bearing on the tectonic history of the NW sector of the Amazonian Craton

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Here we report the results of several U-Pb zircon ages, made to generate an integrated history for the Rio Negro-Juruena tectonic province, for the northwestern part of the Amazonian Craton. This region comprises granitoid rocks, described as calc-alkaline syntectonic gneisses, granites and migmatites, affected by medium level amphibolite facies metamorphism. The new measurements, with the available Rb-Sr and K-Ar ages, indicate the formation of these rocks within a series of essentially juvenile magm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1996, the first SHRIMP U-Pb analyses on zircons from the region were published by Tassinari et al (1996), marking the beginning of what we here consider as 'modern methods' from a U-Pb geochronology standpoint. As mentioned previously, this chapter will not take into consideration the Rb-Sr and K-Ar databases, because a comprehensive compilation and careful analysis of these results was recently done by Cordani et al (2016b), and because these databases have not been expanded since then. The U-Pb, Lu-Hf, and Sm-Nd datasets, on the other hand, have been moderately or significantly expanded, so the discussion provided in this chapter focuses on the data produced using these three isotopic systems as produced since 1996.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In 1996, the first SHRIMP U-Pb analyses on zircons from the region were published by Tassinari et al (1996), marking the beginning of what we here consider as 'modern methods' from a U-Pb geochronology standpoint. As mentioned previously, this chapter will not take into consideration the Rb-Sr and K-Ar databases, because a comprehensive compilation and careful analysis of these results was recently done by Cordani et al (2016b), and because these databases have not been expanded since then. The U-Pb, Lu-Hf, and Sm-Nd datasets, on the other hand, have been moderately or significantly expanded, so the discussion provided in this chapter focuses on the data produced using these three isotopic systems as produced since 1996.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also make mention of the limited (but relevant) δ 18 O Zrn stable isotope results that have recently become available. Thus, the data used for the purposes of this chapter comes from the following sources (in chronologic order): Tassinari et al (1996), Santos et al (2000), Ibañez-Mejia et al (2011), Bonilla-Pérez et al (2013), Ibañez-Mejia (2014, Ibañez-Mejia et al (2015), Cordani et al (2016b), Veras et al (2018). U-Pb results obtained from this compilation are listed in Table 1, along with the sample coordinates (in degrees, using the WGS84 datum), geographic locality (if known), rock-type that was analyzed, and their unique International Geo Sample Number (IGSN) identifier when available.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations