A influência da idade, escolaridade e gênero na ocorrência de pausas do teste DSI

Andrade, Adriana Neves de; Rocha, Jessica Gonçalves Marques da; Iório, Maria Cecília Martinelli; Gil, Daniela

doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20182017286

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Besides the relationship of the presented communication complaints with the auditory skills mentioned before, we must consider that attention and cognitive control are fundamental for the execution of dichotic listening, also influenced by aspects such as memory, language, and planning ability (20)(21)(22)(23) . Factors such as memory and attention may act significantly on auditory perceptual asymmetry (9) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dichotic Sentences Test Performance of Adults with communication complaints

Ferreira

Schochat

Freire³

et al. 2023

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To analyze the performance of normal-hearing adults with communication complaints in the Dichotic Sentences Test. Methods We selected from the database 15 normal-hearing participants with normal results in the Digits Dichotic Test, aged between 19 and 44 years, right-handed, who reported communicative complaints. The Dichotic Sentences Test was applied using two protocols consisting of four different combinations of lists called sequences 1 and 2, in the following order: training, divided attention step, right and left directed attention steps. Results In the first application sequence, the average performance in the divided attention step was 84.7% for the right ear and 60.67% for the left, with statistical difference between ears. The asymmetry between ears varied from -50% to 60%. In the directed attention step, the average performance was 99.33% for the right ear and 98% for the left, with no statistical difference. In the second application sequence, there was a tendency for better results, more pronounced for the left ear, with no statistical significance, with the performance variation and asymmetry between ears remaining high. In the comparison between the sequences, in the divided attention step, it was found that, for the right ear, 40% of the individuals did not vary, 33% performed worse, and 26.7% performed better; for the left ear, 6.6% did not vary, 20% performed worse, and 73.33% performed better. There was result stability in the directed attention step. Conclusion The normal-hearing adults with communication complaints presented a heterogeneous profile, especially in the divided attention step, with a marked difference between ears and response variability.

show abstract