2018
DOI: 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Abbreviated version in Portuguese-speaking adults from three different countries

Abstract: The WHOQOL-Bref fitted models showed adequate factorial validity and invariance in independent subsamples. The transnational non-invariance of the WHOQOL-Bref shows the influence of culture on the operationalization of the quality of life construct.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Portuguese version of the WHOQoL-bref was presented by Fleck et al [ 38 ]. Silva, Bonafé, Marôco, Maloa and Campos [ 39 ] evaluated the psychometric properties of the WHOQoL-bref in different samples and pointed out that a structure of 20 items (1 formulated in the opposite direction; item = 26), 4 domains of first order (Physical: items = 10, 16, 17, 18; Psychological: items = 5, 6, 7, 11, 19, 26; Social Relations: items = 20, 21, 22; Environment: 9, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 25), and 1 domain of second order (Quality of life) presented adequate validity and reliability for the samples of Brazilian and Portuguese university students. Therefore, this refined version of WHOQoL-bref was used in the present study to measure quality of life in both women and men.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Portuguese version of the WHOQoL-bref was presented by Fleck et al [ 38 ]. Silva, Bonafé, Marôco, Maloa and Campos [ 39 ] evaluated the psychometric properties of the WHOQoL-bref in different samples and pointed out that a structure of 20 items (1 formulated in the opposite direction; item = 26), 4 domains of first order (Physical: items = 10, 16, 17, 18; Psychological: items = 5, 6, 7, 11, 19, 26; Social Relations: items = 20, 21, 22; Environment: 9, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 25), and 1 domain of second order (Quality of life) presented adequate validity and reliability for the samples of Brazilian and Portuguese university students. Therefore, this refined version of WHOQoL-bref was used in the present study to measure quality of life in both women and men.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TFEQ was originally proposed by Stunkard and Messick [17] in the English language to assess eating behavior of women and men. This instrument consisted of 51 items ( 24,26,34,39,49). This reduced version has been used in some studies and considered suitable for different samples.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposto como um indicador de saúde, a QV é um construto multidimensional da população e sua avaliação é utilizada para estimular ações de promoção da saúde. Nesse sentido, estudos que mensuram a QV avaliam características como capacidade funcional, dor, estado geral de saúde, vitalidade, aspectos sociais, emocionais e saúde mental (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) Nesse contexto especificamente, os estudos realizados na AP observaram uma variabilidade de percepção da QV, que apontam o domínio "relações sociais" como aquele com a maior contribuição para uma boa QV, e o domínio "ambiente" com a menor (11)(12)(13)(14) . Ressalta-se ainda que a presença de doenças, a baixa adesão ao tratamento e o baixo nível educacional são fatores associados a uma pior percepção da QV em indivíduos atendidos na APS (15) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified