2016
DOI: 10.1590/1983-1447.2016.03.59248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cuidados prestados à mulher na visita domiciliar da “Primeira Semana de Saúde Integral”

Abstract: RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar o cuidado prestado à mulher na visita domiciliar da “Primeira Semana de Saúde Integral”. Método Estudo transversal realizado em serviço especializado do Recife, Pernambuco. Entre setembro e dezembro de 2013, 190 puérperas cadastradas na Estratégia Saúde da Família responderam a um questionário para verificar a existência de associação entre a visita domiciliar e as variáveis investigadas, utilizando o teste Qui-quadrado, com nível de confiança de 95%. Resultados Predominou idade d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
21

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
15
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies were quantitative (76.7%) (33), and 37.2% (16) are evaluative, 20.9% (9) qualitative, 13.9% (6) cross-sectional, 11.6% (5) clinical trial, 7% (3) cohort and the same quantity of quasi-experimental, and one was descriptive. Regarding evaluation of methodological quality, 12.5% (2) of the 16 evaluative papers were rated excellent, 56.25% (9) very good and 31.25% (5) good, with two value judgments 18,19 . The others were classified by level of evidence, predominantly at level IV, 59.3% (16), followed by level III, 22.2% (6) and level II, 18.5% (5); and regarding CASP, most were classified as very good, 51.8% 14, 25.9% (7) as excellent and 22.2% (6) as good.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Most studies were quantitative (76.7%) (33), and 37.2% (16) are evaluative, 20.9% (9) qualitative, 13.9% (6) cross-sectional, 11.6% (5) clinical trial, 7% (3) cohort and the same quantity of quasi-experimental, and one was descriptive. Regarding evaluation of methodological quality, 12.5% (2) of the 16 evaluative papers were rated excellent, 56.25% (9) very good and 31.25% (5) good, with two value judgments 18,19 . The others were classified by level of evidence, predominantly at level IV, 59.3% (16), followed by level III, 22.2% (6) and level II, 18.5% (5); and regarding CASP, most were classified as very good, 51.8% 14, 25.9% (7) as excellent and 22.2% (6) as good.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies indicate a low level of HV 18,21,25,33 , and the same occurs more frequently in Brazil when it comes to family health facilities, performed mainly by Community Health Workers 18,25 . HV are more likely when the team monitors women during the prenatal period 18,33 .…”
Section: Home Visit As a Postpartum Care Toolmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations