2021
DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-2020-0126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Patterns of species replacement and richness differences along environmental gradients or ecoregions shed light on different ecological and evolutionary mechanisms acting on community structure. Communities of aquatic ecosystems of different watersheds are supposed to host distinct species and lineages. Quantifying and understanding the degree to which these differences are affected by environmental and biogeographical factors remains an open question for these environments, particularly in the Neotropical reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of this combination allows inference of relative niche importance (Leibold et al, 2004) and biotic (e.g., competitive asymmetry between co‐occurring species) (Godoy et al, 2014) and historical factors (Kissling et al, 2012). Over the last 20 years, the application of phylogenetic diversity has made great progress in studying and revealing the mechanism of community assembly, but examples of the phylogenetic approach are more common for terrestrial communities, mainly plants (Arnan et al, 2018; Aslani et al, 2022; Carlucci et al, 2017; Jiao et al, 2021), than for aquatic environments, despite its potential to reveal important ecological processes in the latter (Nakamura et al, 2021). Overall, the complex and rich functional traits and evolutionary history of freshwater fish diversity (Albert et al, 2020) make this group an interesting model for studying community assembly from taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic perspectives, but few studies on fish communities in freshwater ecosystems have been conducted using these three dimensions of diversity simultaneously (Jia et al, 2021; Liu & Wang, 2018; Qian et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of this combination allows inference of relative niche importance (Leibold et al, 2004) and biotic (e.g., competitive asymmetry between co‐occurring species) (Godoy et al, 2014) and historical factors (Kissling et al, 2012). Over the last 20 years, the application of phylogenetic diversity has made great progress in studying and revealing the mechanism of community assembly, but examples of the phylogenetic approach are more common for terrestrial communities, mainly plants (Arnan et al, 2018; Aslani et al, 2022; Carlucci et al, 2017; Jiao et al, 2021), than for aquatic environments, despite its potential to reveal important ecological processes in the latter (Nakamura et al, 2021). Overall, the complex and rich functional traits and evolutionary history of freshwater fish diversity (Albert et al, 2020) make this group an interesting model for studying community assembly from taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic perspectives, but few studies on fish communities in freshwater ecosystems have been conducted using these three dimensions of diversity simultaneously (Jia et al, 2021; Liu & Wang, 2018; Qian et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional beta diversity describes differences in these traits between communities (Wootton, 2012;Leibold and Chase, 2017). Phylogenetic beta diversity allows us to investigate evolutionary differences among communities (Weinstein et al, 2014;Nakamura et al, 2017Nakamura et al, , 2021Li F. et al, 2021;Li Z. et al, 2021). Thus, metacommunity approaches can also use functional and phylogenetic beta diversity to complement taxonomic beta diversity to provide additional insights and a more complete diversity picture (Anderson et al, 2011;Leibold and Chase, 2017;Cai et al, 2019;Jia et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using data from benthic fish assemblage of the main channel of whitewater rivers of Central Amazon (Japurá, Purus and Madeira rivers), we tested the hypothesis that there are marked spatial and seasonal differences in community composition. Despite being rivers with similar characteristics, their origins and basin formation can offer different conditions that are reflected in the composition of fish species (Lundberg et al 1998, Nakamura et al 2021). In addition, current fishing pressures on species, as mentioned, and even environmental changes caused by rising and receding water levels during the flood pulse can lead to changes in the biotic communities present in each river.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%