2021
DOI: 10.1590/1980-549720210047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating underdiagnosis of COVID-19 with nowcasting and machine learning

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the underdiagnosis of COVID-19 through nowcasting with machine learning in a Southern Brazilian capital city. Methods: Observational ecological design and data from 3916 notified cases of COVID-19 from April 14th to June 2nd, 2020 in Florianópolis, Brazil. A machine-learning algorithm was used to classify cases that had no diagnosis, producing the nowcast. To analyze the underdiagnosis, the difference between data without nowcasting and the median of the nowcasted projections for the ent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By harnessing the power of machine learning and artificial intelligence, it is possible to offer an alternative to standard biochemical diagnostic tools, such as reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays, which in some parts of the world remain expensive and difficult to obtain ( 60 ). It may also be useful in analysing a dynamic of current clinical state of patients, and on this basis nowcasting the further disease development ( 61 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By harnessing the power of machine learning and artificial intelligence, it is possible to offer an alternative to standard biochemical diagnostic tools, such as reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays, which in some parts of the world remain expensive and difficult to obtain ( 60 ). It may also be useful in analysing a dynamic of current clinical state of patients, and on this basis nowcasting the further disease development ( 61 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%