“Cross” modalities: are the AMRAP, RFT and EMOM models applicable to health?

Grigoletto, Marzo Edir Da Silva; Heredia‐Elvar, Juan Ramón; Oliveira, Levy Anthony de

doi:10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e75400

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 11 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Besides, depending on the velocity loss they reach over the set time, they will perform a higher number of repetitions/rounds in the pre-defined total time. In this way, the subject who could initially perform better would be the one who trains with less relative intensity, being able to perform the exercises at a higher velocity and possibly with a lesser velocity loss in the set, compared to those who perform the same number of repetitions with the same absolute load, which represents a higher relative intensity (Silva-Grigoletto et al, 2020). The AMRAP method could produce a significant increased in maximal aerobic capacity, an increased in maximal oxygen consumption expressed as a function of body mass was significantly correlated with an increased in absolute oxygen consumption.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Eight-Week Functional Training with Ascending AMRAP Model and FOR TIME Constant Load Model to Increase Abdominal Muscle Strength and Maximal Oxygen Consumption Levels in Adolescent Males

Hafidz

Prianto

Hidayat

2022

Teor. metod. fiz. vihov.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study purpose was to investigate the effect of functional training with the ascending AMRAP model and with the FOR TIME constant load model on increasing abdominal muscle strength and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) in adolescent males. Materials and methods. This study used the True-Experimental method with the research design of the Randomized Control Group Pretest-Posttest Design. A total of 21 adolescent males aged 18–21, body mass index (BMI) 18.5–24.9 kg/m2, normal blood pressure, normal resting heart rate, normal oxygen saturation (SpO2) participated in this study and were divided into three groups, namely CTRLG (n = 7; control group), FSTAG (n = 7; ascending AMRAP functional training group), and FSTFG (n = 7; FOR TIME constant load functional training group). Both the ascending AMRAPfunctional training and the FOR TIME constant load functional training interventions were carried out with a frequency of 3 times/week for 8 weeks. Statistical analysis used the one-way ANOVA test with the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software version 21. Results. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the mean delta (Δ) increase in abdominal muscle strength (p ≤ 0.05). The mean delta (Δ) increase in VO2max also showed a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, it was shown that the administration of functional training intervention with the ascending AMRAP model and functional training intervention with the FOR TIME constant load model which was carried out 3 times/week for 8 weeks increased abdominal muscle strength and maximal oxygen consumption levels.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Eight-Week Functional Training with Ascending AMRAP Model and FOR TIME Constant Load Model to Increase Abdominal Muscle Strength and Maximal Oxygen Consumption Levels in Adolescent Males

Hafidz

Prianto

Hidayat

2022

Teor. metod. fiz. vihov.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many studies have identified situations of rhabdomyolysis related to this type of high-intensity effort [47][48][49]. Hence, it is likely that all-out training through FFT tactics such as AMRAP, RFT, or EMON (every minute on the minute) could have adverse health impacts [11]. In a recent study, Alsamir Tibana et al (2019) [46] tried to determine whether self-regulation of training intensity based on RPE is a reliable method to control work intensity during metabolic conditioning sessions of FFT.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another difference between HIIT and FFT is that the latter lacks prescribed rest intervals [1]. Many FFT workouts consist of completing a set number of repetitions in the shortest time possible ("rounds for time") or completing within a set time frame as many repetitions as possible ("AMRAP") of a set of exercises [1,11]. Hence, rest or recovery intervals are introduced by athletes "as needed" depending on their physical fitness level or the nature of the FFT workout.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Introducing Rest Intervals in Functional Fitness Training

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Functional Fitness Training (FFT) is a new exercise modality prioritizing functional multi-joint movements executed at high intensity as a circuit. Objective: To examine the impacts of introducing rest intervals in a FFT workout compared to “rounds for time” (RFT) FFT. Materials and Methods: Participants were 25 resistance-trained adults who completed two FFT workouts 1 week apart. The study design was crossover such that in a given session half the participants completed the standard and the other half the adapted FFT (FFTadapted). The workouts consisted of the same exercises (circuit of four rounds of exercises), but one (FFTadapted) included preset rest intervals (three sets of 1 min after each completed round). Before and after the workouts, countermovement jump ability and blood lactate were measured. Heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured post-exercise. Results: For both the standard and adapted protocols, mean HR was 90% age-predicted maximum. Final RPE was also similar for both workouts (~15–15.5) and indicated a “hard” work intensity. Both FFTs took the same time to complete (~13 min). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in jump ability between FFTs. In contrast, lactate (15.11 ± 3.64 vs. 13.48 ± 3.64 mmol·L−1, p < 0.05), measured 3 min post-exercise, was significantly lower in FFTadapted. Conclusions: In FFTadapted, there was a significant reduction in RPE and blood lactate concentrations after exercise, while there were no significant differences in either HR or jumping ability, compared to a FFT workout in RFT methodology.

show abstract

“…In the AMRAP model, the largest possible task volume (number of repetitions or rounds) is performed in a fixed time interval. In the EMOM model, the exercise must be performed within one minute, while in the FT model, the proposed task must be completed in the shortest time possible [9,11]. In addition to the AMRAP, the EMOM and FT models can also have a fixed total time interval or a time cap for task conclusion.…”

Section: "Cross" Modalitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Pacing Strategies in AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME Training Models during “Cross” Modalities

Oliveira

Heredia‐Elvar

Maté-Muñoz

et al. 2021

Sports

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Empirically, it is widely discussed in “Cross” modalities that the pacing strategy developed by an athlete or trainee has a significant impact on the endurance performance in a WOD in the AMRAP, EMOM, or FOR TIME model. We can observe at least six pacing strategies adopted during the cyclical modalities in the endurance performance in the scientific literature. However, besides these modalities, exercises of acyclical modalities of weightlifting and gymnastics are performed in the “Cross” modalities. These exercises may not allow the same pacing strategies adopted during cyclic modalities’ movements due to their motor characteristics and different intensity and level of effort imposed to perform the motor gesture. In addition to the intensity and level of effort that are generally unknown to the coach and athlete of the “Cross” modalities, another factor that can influence the adoption of a pacing strategy during a WOD in the AMRAP, EMOM, or FOR TIME model is the task endpoint knowledge, which varies according to the training model used. Thus, our objective was to evaluate situations in which these factors can influence the pacing strategies adopted in a self-regulated task with cyclic and acyclic modalities movements during an endurance workout in the AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME model. Given the scarcity of studies in the scientific literature and the increasing discussion of this topic within the “Cross” modalities, this manuscript can help scientists and coaches better orient their research problems or training programs and analyze and interpret new findings more accurately.

show abstract

“Cross” modalities: are the AMRAP, RFT and EMOM models applicable to health?

Cited by 7 publications

References 11 publications

Eight-Week Functional Training with Ascending AMRAP Model and FOR TIME Constant Load Model to Increase Abdominal Muscle Strength and Maximal Oxygen Consumption Levels in Adolescent Males

Eight-Week Functional Training with Ascending AMRAP Model and FOR TIME Constant Load Model to Increase Abdominal Muscle Strength and Maximal Oxygen Consumption Levels in Adolescent Males

Effects of Introducing Rest Intervals in Functional Fitness Training

Analysis of Pacing Strategies in AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME Training Models during “Cross” Modalities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About