1993
DOI: 10.1590/1809-43921993231035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE EFECTS OF SETTLEMENT ON THE PREVALENCE OF AscarisINFECTION IN TWO AMERINDIAN POPULATIONS OF THE BRAZILIAN AMAZON

Abstract: -Studies were made of the intestinal parasites of Amerindian populations of the Uaupes River basin of Brazil. Three groups were sampled: 1) Tukano fisher-agriculturalists who live in permanent riverine villages; 2) Maku hunter-horticulturalists who live in close contact with the Tukano fishing villages; and 3) Maku who inhabit the forest interior and have little contact with permanent settlements. Fecal samples were collected from 498 individuals of which 220 were from the first group, 135 from de second and 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is probably explained by enhanced hygiene or frequent antihelminthic administration in health-care staff. Because almost all participants had intestinal helminth infections, similar to other studies in this region, 18,19 the current research could not meaningfully compare naturally infected versus uninfected individuals. However, our previous research in a nearby community 12 and research in other settings 19 have shown that TST results do not differ between individuals who are naturally infected versus naturally uninfected with intestinal helminths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is probably explained by enhanced hygiene or frequent antihelminthic administration in health-care staff. Because almost all participants had intestinal helminth infections, similar to other studies in this region, 18,19 the current research could not meaningfully compare naturally infected versus uninfected individuals. However, our previous research in a nearby community 12 and research in other settings 19 have shown that TST results do not differ between individuals who are naturally infected versus naturally uninfected with intestinal helminths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…18,19 Despite this, gastrointestinal symptoms were rare and were not associated with high helminth burden or helminth co-infections. 20 The stool microscopy was performed by staff blinded to information about participants, and it was striking that only health-care professionals were free from intestinal helminths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several zoonotic enteric parasites can be transmitted to humans from dogs, cats, and other pets/companion animals [ 101 ]. In this review, many of the study authors pointed out that interactions with dogs, in particular, are a high risk for ZEP transmission among nomadic and pastoralist communities largely due to the practice of throwing viscera and offal from slaughtered animals to the dogs to eat [ 51 , 54 – 57 , 59 , 61 , 62 , 64 66 , 68 71 , 73 , 89 , 91 , 98 – 99 , 102 ]. For example, this behavior is estimated to increase the exposure risk for acquiring Echinococcosus spp .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wildlife share the same space as the pastoral communities in many regions and due to their bounty and diversity, ZEPs are provided multiples opportunities for intermediate and definitive host species for which to proliferate [ 21 ]. Some nomadic communities also hunt wildlife leading to more exposure threats for ZEP transmission to humans [ 47 , 51 , 61 , 62 , 65 , 67 , 81 , 64 65 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many ethnographic examples where transmission of leadership or elites' rules of descent are different than the ones for the population at large. Chernela (1993), in discussing the kinship and marriage system among the Wanano, explained that most of these rules were followed primarily, if not exclusively, by the higher ranking lineages and not by the lower-status ones. For this reason descent was not taken as seriously by the lower-status groups as it was among the high-ranked ones.…”
Section: Succession In the Chiefdoms Of The Greater Antilles: Previoumentioning
confidence: 99%