1981
DOI: 10.1590/1809-43921981111013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sistemas de polonização de duas espécies simpátricas de Dalechampia (Euphorbiaceae) no Amazonas, Brasil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was determined from pollen collecting behavior as well as the frequency and time of permanence on the flowers. Similarly, Gimenes (2002) (Armbruster & Webster 1981;Armbruster & Herzig 1984), they seem to be important sources of pollen for T. diversipes. The high frequency of Dalechampia's pollen grains in the analyzed samples and the absence of information on resin collection by Tetrapedia bees, reinforce the evidence that Dalechampia species are important sources of pollen for this bee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This was determined from pollen collecting behavior as well as the frequency and time of permanence on the flowers. Similarly, Gimenes (2002) (Armbruster & Webster 1981;Armbruster & Herzig 1984), they seem to be important sources of pollen for T. diversipes. The high frequency of Dalechampia's pollen grains in the analyzed samples and the absence of information on resin collection by Tetrapedia bees, reinforce the evidence that Dalechampia species are important sources of pollen for this bee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The interfloral distances generally determine the minimum size of the effective pollinator (Armbruster and Webster 1981, Armbruster 1985 and personal observation). Small amounts of resin attract only certain species of female bees, large amounts of resin attract other species of female bees, fragrances attract only certain male bees.…”
Section: The Plants and Their Pollinatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional specificity derives from differences between species in time of day of flower and bract opening and in the distances between the gland and the stigmas and between the gland and the anthers. The interfloral distances generally determine the minimum size of the effective pollinator (Armbruster and Webster 1981, Armbruster 1985 and personal observation).…”
Section: The Plants and Their Pollinatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although visits of bees to Dalechampia were observed in Brazil in the 19th century, little was understood about the pollination until the observations of Webster in Mexico in 1976 (Armbruster & and Sazima, Sazima & Carvalho-Okano in Brazil in 1979(Sazima et al, 1985. Additional observations have been reported from Panama (Armbruster & Herzig, 1984), Ecuador (Armbruster & Webster, 1982), Amazonian Brazil (Armbruster & Webster, 1981) and Costa Rica (Armbruster, 1983(Armbruster, , 1984b. It is now apparent that the majority of neotropical species are pollinated by female bees that visit the inflorescences to gather resin from the gland in the staminate subflorescence.…”
Section: Ecologymentioning
confidence: 87%