2020
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saliva: an important alternative for screening and monitoring of COVID-19 in children

Abstract: The increasing number of cases of COVID-19 worldwide poses challenges to healthcare systems not only in effectively identifying individuals positive for SARS-CoV-2, but also in isolating cases to minimise contagion in early diagnosing more severe cases that will need hospitalization. Less-invasive collection methods are indispensable in a pandemic scenario as large-scale tests are necessary to understand the actual evolution of contagion in different populations, thus enabling decision-making based on scientif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Massive testing is one of the most effective strategies for preventing COVID-19 transmission by allowing early identification of cases and decision-making based on the pandemic's behaviour 1 . Nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) is the standard sample for molecular test, which causes much discomfort and possible cross-contamination during the collection 1,2 . Therefore, a trained healthcare professional is required for performing this procedure 1,3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Massive testing is one of the most effective strategies for preventing COVID-19 transmission by allowing early identification of cases and decision-making based on the pandemic's behaviour 1 . Nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) is the standard sample for molecular test, which causes much discomfort and possible cross-contamination during the collection 1,2 . Therefore, a trained healthcare professional is required for performing this procedure 1,3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saliva has been shown to be a reliable, safe diagnostic fluid for detection of SARS-CoV-2, with a sensitivity ranging from 80-100% compared to NPS in adult population 1,3,4 . In paediatrics, the use of saliva has clear advantages because the collection of this fluid is less invasive, thus reducing the discomfort and allowing self-collection 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vários estudos, de diversos países, relatam sintomas consistentes com infecção por SARS-CoV-2 nos dias e semanas anteriores ao aparecimento de frieiras ou contato com pessoas que apresentaram esses sintomas (Andina et al, 2021;Docampo-Simon et al, 2020;Khalili et al, 2021;Li et al, 2020;Singh, Kaur, Singh, & Sen, 2021). Foi também relatado nos artigos, que a exposição de crianças ao SARS-CoV-2 resulta no desenvolvimento da Síndrome Inflamatória Multissistêmica (Kabeerdoss et al, 2021;Santos et al, 2020). O diagnóstico é baseado em critérios clínicos que incluem febre por pelo menos cinco dias e presença de algumas características clinicas como: injeção conjuntival bilateral; linfadenopatia cervical; alterações da mucosa oral; erupções cutâneas polimórficas; edema ou vermelhidão das extremidades e exclusão de diagnósticos alternativos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Ao contrário dos adultos, as crianças com a COVID-19 apresentam sintomas clínicos mais brandos, e em muitos casos, assintomáticos. Porém, mesmo nestas condições não impede de transmitir o vírus (Mehta et al, 2020;Santos et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…It has been reported that influenza virus A, Ebola virus, Cytomegalovirus, and Herpes simplex virus could be identified in salivary samples (68). During the pandemic of COVID-19, testing of saliva samples for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) attracted a lot of attention because of the ease associated with self-collection and a decrease in the risk of exposure associated with the collection of nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal samples by healthcare workers (39,40,(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74). The coincidence rate for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 between salivary samples and nasopharyngeal swabs was 91.7~100% (39,40).…”
Section: Pneumoniamentioning
confidence: 99%