2016
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9061-2015-0214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Eggshell Thickness on the Hatchability of Guinea Fowl and Pheasants

Abstract: Successful incubation affects the number of healthy chicks in all poultry species. This study examined the effect of eggshell thickness on the hatching rates of guinea fowl and pheasant eggs. In total, 964 guinea fowl and 1,728 pheasant eggs were used in the study. Eggshell thickness was measured directly with an ultrasound gauge. Thicknesses ranged between 0.27-0.47 mm in guinea fowl and 0.24-0.49 mm in pheasant eggs. Incubation periods were 28 days for guinea fowl and 25 days for pheasant eggs. At the end of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant differences were observed between hatching rates and eggshell thickness of chicken eggs [ 7 ]. Similar results were found in partridge [ 8 ], guinea fowl, and pheasant eggs [ 9 ]. Furthermore, the effect of eggshell thickness on hatching time was found insignificant [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No significant differences were observed between hatching rates and eggshell thickness of chicken eggs [ 7 ]. Similar results were found in partridge [ 8 ], guinea fowl, and pheasant eggs [ 9 ]. Furthermore, the effect of eggshell thickness on hatching time was found insignificant [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The differences between hatching rates by eggshell thickness values were not statistically significant for Experiment 1 (p=0.236) and Experiment 2 (p=0.965). Similar to these findings, no significant differences were found in hatching rates of guinea fowl and pheasant eggs by eggshell thickness [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Eggshellthickness was also no significantly different between hatched and unhatched groups of eggs. This result agrees with Yamak et al (2016),but disagrees with that of Huwaida et al, (2015). Egg shape index was significantly different (p <0.05) between hatched and unhatched groups of eggs.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Variation of shell thickness during the laying period was also observed by Nickolova (2009), but without statistical significance, while Adamski (2008) measured significantly thicker shell in the early stage compared to peak and late stages of the laying period, which is in accordance with our findings. Thicker shell is usually considered as unsuitable in hatching eggs (Bernacki et al, 2013), but Yamak et al (2016) achieved similar hatchability results in eggs categorized as thin-, medium-and thick-shelled (<0.31, 0.31-0.35 and >0.35 mm, respectively).…”
Section: Tab1 Egg Weight and Shell Quality Traits (M ± Se)mentioning
confidence: 95%