2016
DOI: 10.1590/1679-78252575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Modeling Technique of Fiber Pullout from a Cement Matrix with Different Interface Mechanical Properties Using Finite Element Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fiber–matrix interactions are comparable to those for a steel bar embedded in concrete [ 1 ]. Several systems for simulating the bond-slip of steel rebar in concrete have been suggested in the literature [ 30 , 31 , 33 ]. Here, the surface-to-surface contact model [ 34 ] was used to simulate the fiber–matrix bond-slip response, which requires selecting the master and slave surfaces.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fiber–matrix interactions are comparable to those for a steel bar embedded in concrete [ 1 ]. Several systems for simulating the bond-slip of steel rebar in concrete have been suggested in the literature [ 30 , 31 , 33 ]. Here, the surface-to-surface contact model [ 34 ] was used to simulate the fiber–matrix bond-slip response, which requires selecting the master and slave surfaces.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though many simulation schemes have been established, the existing research has many expediencies, reliabilities, and uninterrupted simulation issues for the microstructural fracture mechanics of SFRC (i.e., single fiber pullout). Simulation disturbance is commonly caused by numerical discrepancies and is associated with the nonlinearity of the fiber–matrix bond [ 30 ]. Therefore, stable simulation of the single hooked-end fiber pullout model is scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Ferreira and Wang proposed a continuous modeling technique to simulate the fiber debonding and pullout processes from a cement matrix using different interface mechanical properties. Interface elements with cohesive surface tractions were used in the fiber-matrix interface to simulate debonding process, whereas spring elements with a variable stiffness related to the shear stress were employed for the pull-out process (Friedrich and Wang 2016). According to the numerical results, a change from τ=1.5 MPa to τ=2.5 MPa, which is a possible deviation between experimental tests, considerably influences the behavior of the pull-out force with the slip displacement, leading, for example, to an increase of the maximum pull out force from 9.5 N to 15 N, approximately.…”
Section: Fiber-matrix Interfacial Strength : Measurement Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that in the simulation, the computed maximum shear stresses are overestimated when compared to those calculated in the experimental work [6], which could be explained by the perfectly bonded rigid interface. A simulation that takes into account a cohesive interface [43][44][45] could provide more accurate results; however, since we are interested in using the numerical simulations to better understand the 3D stress distribution and directions, the model here employed was deemed sufficient for our simulation results. Figure 9a shows the contour plot of the first (maximum) principal stress r 1 in the elements located at the symmetry Plane 1 (Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%